Quote (thesnipa @ Aug 2 2018 01:21pm)
factually they're full of more holes than a pasta strainer. they just happen to tackle projects, from illegal operations to hidden camera stuff, that no one else does. they are an interesting and entertaining network, generally, but they're a terrible source to cite. They don't have nearly as stringent of an adherence to facts as other networks, which are also not very good with facts in the 24-7 instant information demand meta.
really? care to cite an instance where they erred in there reporting? I won't deny it's left leaning, but they often interview people on each sides of an issue which I really enjoy about them.
they often seem to be the first major media outlet to break certain stories; like most recently, twitter shadow banning far right politicians/personalities.