d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Official Political Picture Thread
Prev1221322142215221622175001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Views: 919498Replies: 50000Track Topic
Member
Posts: 61,688
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 28.77
#22141
Aug 30 2018 01:09pm
Quote (Ghot @ Aug 30 2018 12:02pm)
https://img-9gag-fun.9cache.com/photo/a7MY62w_460s.jpg



https://img-9gag-fun.9cache.com/photo/a47XVv6_460s.jpg


1. She was referring to Soros stringing them up for failing the Cobra mission, not Trump. Also, this was hearsay from a Fake News NBC producer.

2.
Quote
District Judge Emilio Chavez on Wednesday dismissed charges against three of the five defendants -- Lucas Morton, Subhannah Wahhaj and Hujrah Wahhaj -- ruling that authorities violated the state’s “10-day rule.”

Child abuse charges against them were dropped because prosecutors missed the 10-day limit for an evidentiary hearing to establish probable cause.

During a separate hearing Wednesday, Judge Jeff McElroy dismissed the same charges against fellow defendants, Siraj Ibn Wahhaj and Jany Leveille. However, charges leveled against them on Friday, in connection to the death of a missing 3-year-old boy, remained.


So you are in favor of lawlessness? Because the judge enforced the law as it is written, literally. If he hadn't, he would be promoting a lawless society and completely failing his job as a judge.

This post was edited by inkanddagger on Aug 30 2018 01:14pm
Member
Posts: 105,148
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
#22142
Aug 30 2018 01:17pm

Quote
Child abuse charges against them were dropped because prosecutors missed the 10-day limit for an evidentiary hearing to establish probable cause.


Doesn't mean they weren't guilty.
Maybe we should be concerned with the judge that is making these rulings. Like the... let them out of jail, to begin with.
I see a problem with the judge. That is what needs to be addressed.

Oh wait, too bad the SC isn't in session. :/
Member
Posts: 93,001
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
#22143
Aug 30 2018 01:20pm
Quote (Ghot @ Aug 30 2018 01:17pm)
Doesn't mean they weren't guilty.
Maybe we should be concerned with the judge that is making these rulings. Like the... let them out of jail, to begin with.
I see a problem with the judge. That is what needs to be addressed.

Oh wait, too bad the SC isn't in session. :/


He isn't guilty because he was never tried and found guilty - Ghot on roy moore

:rofl:
Member
Posts: 61,688
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 28.77
#22144
Aug 30 2018 01:22pm
Quote (Ghot @ Aug 30 2018 12:17pm)
Doesn't mean they weren't guilty.
Maybe we should be concerned with the judge that is making these rulings. Like the... let them out of jail, to begin with.
I see a problem with the judge. That is what needs to be addressed.

Oh wait, too bad the SC isn't in session. :/


So you want the judge to break the law and order law enforcement to carry out his personal opinion instead?

Isn't that the dreaded judicial activism conservatives have been warning us about for ages?

This post was edited by inkanddagger on Aug 30 2018 01:22pm
Member
Posts: 105,148
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
#22145
Aug 30 2018 01:25pm
Quote (inkanddagger @ Aug 30 2018 03:22pm)
So you want the judge to break the law and order law enforcement to carry out his personal opinion instead?

Isn't that the dreaded judicial activism conservatives have been warning us about for ages?




Judges interpret the law, that is their job. A judge purposely misinterpreting the law for w/e reason, is meat for the SC to deal with, and they will.
Member
Posts: 61,688
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 28.77
#22146
Aug 30 2018 01:29pm
Quote (Ghot @ Aug 30 2018 12:25pm)
Judges interpret the law, that is their job. A judge purposely misinterpreting the law for w/e reason, is meat for the SC to deal with, and they will.


The 10 day limit is a hard cap, not an interpretation. Are you in favor of the rule of law or of lawlessness?
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
#22147
Aug 30 2018 01:31pm
Member
Posts: 105,148
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
#22148
Aug 30 2018 01:31pm
Quote (inkanddagger @ Aug 30 2018 03:29pm)
The 10 day limit is a hard cap, not an interpretation. Are you in favor of the rule of law or of lawlessness?




So you want me to believe that the prosecution, aka, lawyers, didn't know about this 10 day limit? LOL
Member
Posts: 105,148
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
#22149
Aug 30 2018 01:35pm






Member
Posts: 61,688
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 28.77
#22150
Aug 30 2018 01:42pm
Quote (Ghot @ Aug 30 2018 12:31pm)
So you want me to believe that the prosecution, aka, lawyers, didn't know about this 10 day limit? LOL


Yes. I want you to understand that the people who purposefully dropped the ball on this are the prosecution and the Deep State agents in the alphabet agencies who failed to do this within the allotted window in order to create a smokescreen of blaming the "liberal" judge (whose hands are tied by the law) rather than corruption in the FBI. They've successfully created a liberal vs conservative false narrative in order to protect their assets and their authoritarian-agenda.

This post was edited by inkanddagger on Aug 30 2018 01:43pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1221322142215221622175001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact