d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Abortion
Prev1212223242557Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 22,440
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 96.11
Dec 4 2021 12:00pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Dec 4 2021 09:50am)
No, I already said to you that even after 23 weeks it's a balance between women's rights vs the fetus's right.

Prior to 23 weeks: Absolute right to abortion. It's an object, not a person

After 23 weeks: Balancing between bodily autonomy and fetus right to life.

My personal opinion is that until abortion becomes effectively the same risk and procedure as a birth it should be legal. At a certain point there's very little difference between carrying a fetus to term and birthing, versus getting an abortion, so the burden on the woman's rights becomes lesser. Where we set the crossover point is where we should be having the debate, but those on the right aren't approaching this topic honestly so we are stuck on if it should be allowed at all.

Kind of like climate change. It took 50 years from the time it was known with near certainty it was happening for right-wingers to even acknowledge it.


To me that perspective speaks more to the safety and risk-profile rather than the conferment of personhood. What, to you, would be the considerations to not allow an abortion at 23+ weeks due to fetal rights?
Member
Posts: 3,046
Joined: Oct 1 2021
Gold: 1,979.01
Dec 4 2021 12:00pm
Obviously abortion is barbaric, downright demonic, violent, disgusting, and you'll burn in hell forever....

But

In terms of legality, fuck it. Kill your own offspring. In fact I prefer it, if you're the type to do such a thing, and you're removing your own gene pool from the human race's future, GOOD.

Now, since I don't want to take away your bodily autonomy, can you stop trying to take away mine? No? Thought so.
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Dec 4 2021 12:08pm
The Rights only beef with fundamental Islam at this point is that so many of them have brown skin lol.

This post was edited by Skinned on Dec 4 2021 12:08pm
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Dec 4 2021 12:30pm
Quote (fender @ Dec 4 2021 11:49am)
you KNOW what the best way to lower the number of abortions is, yet i only ever see you and your ilk advocate in favour of taking women's rights away, of measures that will disproportionately hurt poor people and minorities.

if "responsibility" was what you're really after, you'd advocate for comprehensive sex ed, and fight back against christian conservative "purity" / abstinence bullshit. if "preserving life and promoting the common good" was your goal, you'd support a system that protects and helps parents and children, not shames and abandons them immediately after birth.

ideologically blinded people tend to delude themselves, claiming they're coming from a place of compassion, but they ignore the bigger picture, the reality of situation, and the fact that even those (rape / incest victims / severe medical complications...) they would generously allow such an unthinkable cruelty (until the mistress gets pregnant), will be hurt in the process.

putting your personal feelings, morals, and religious convictions over the rights of women - modern christianity at its best. the western taliban are alive and well in the US...


Outlawing abortion is restoring women's rights, as about half of the unborn human beings killed are female, and the right to life clearly outweighs the right to sacrifice the unborn in the name of American individualism.

Also, doing evil so that good may come of it is something the Catholic Church stands against, so yes, I oppose promoting contraceptives in public schools.
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Dec 4 2021 12:35pm
Quote (IceMage @ Dec 4 2021 01:30pm)
Outlawing abortion is restoring women's rights, as about half of the unborn human beings killed are female, and the right to life clearly outweighs the right to sacrifice the unborn in the name of American individualism.

Also, doing evil so that good may come of it is something the Catholic Church stands against, so yes, I oppose promoting contraceptives in public schools.


It's the same rationale for why Catholics argue against the nuclear bombings of Japan in WW2. Just because it probably saved a bunch of lives doesn't make it morally right to intentionally vaporize a bunch of civilians.
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Dec 4 2021 12:44pm
Quote (IceMage @ 4 Dec 2021 19:30)
Outlawing abortion is restoring women's rights, as about half of the unborn human beings killed are female, and the right to life clearly outweighs the right to sacrifice the unborn in the name of American individualism.

Also, doing evil so that good may come of it is something the Catholic Church stands against, so yes, I oppose promoting contraceptives in public schools.


a fetus is not a woman.
comprehensive sex education is more that "promoting contraceptives".

you can't wordplay your way out of the fact that you're in favour of taking other people's rights away in order for them to live according to your morals.
what your church considers "evil" can NOT be the basis for LAW in a secular nation. you're free to indoctrinate your children with your weird moral bullshit, public schools should not brainwash children with that kind of religious propaganda.

if you want to live in a theocracy, move to one.
Member
Posts: 22,440
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 96.11
Dec 4 2021 02:07pm
Quote (IceMage @ Dec 4 2021 10:30am)
Outlawing abortion is restoring women's rights, as about half of the unborn human beings killed are female, and the right to life clearly outweighs the right to sacrifice the unborn in the name of American individualism.

Also, doing evil so that good may come of it is something the Catholic Church stands against, so yes, I oppose promoting contraceptives in public schools.


I find it a bit perplexing why you'd be so opposed to abortion while also so opposed to the very factors that decrease unintended pregnancy--and thus abortion.
Member
Posts: 2,614
Joined: Sep 17 2021
Gold: 0.00
Dec 4 2021 02:11pm
can unborn fetsues form a coalition to protest for their own right to later on become a human being? they really should get on that, my body my choice and all that
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Dec 4 2021 02:25pm
Quote (Handcuffs @ Dec 4 2021 02:07pm)
I find it a bit perplexing why you'd be so opposed to abortion while also so opposed to the very factors that decrease unintended pregnancy--and thus abortion.


Feeling good vs Doing good are often at odds with each other. Just essentialist nonsense where "doing the right thing" is divorced from consequences and makes the world worse as a result.

The stance against abortion has zero biblical support, and is outright contradicted in many passages. It's about feeling good about imposing punishments, consequences, and hierarchy rather than actually "saving unborn children".

Although I will say that Catholic's position on in-vitro fertilization and birth control in general is more consistent than most Christians. I've yet to get a legitimate answer on the subject from anybody who isn't Catholic.

This post was edited by NetflixAdaptationWidow on Dec 4 2021 02:25pm
Member
Posts: 32,985
Joined: Mar 17 2005
Gold: 6.00
Dec 4 2021 02:25pm
I'd be willing to be a union boss for these future workers so long as the parents cover the dues til they enter the workforce.

cause im a good guy and all that
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1212223242557Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll