Being against forcing people to pay for other people's birth control is not the same as being against birth control.

what does this even mean?

individually no.
Keeping a society in mind: where one would want accessible birth control for everyone, then it ends up being the same thing.

No, there are plenty of avenues for cheap/free birthcontrol that do not require coercing those against paying for it.

... and they are also not effective..

Let's not have this silly 3rd world country discussion here.. Better make a topic for it.

[citation needed]

Its very effective and we have cheap/free access to birth control right now.


Ah yes, only the 3rd world uncivilized barbarians would have a policy like not forcing other people to pay for your birth control when they morally object to it.

Want a topic? Go for it.
Although some arguments would be nice in place of snippy jibes.

Dude, you need a citation on free birth control not being effective ?

Lol. That's the part that doesn't want me to discuss this with you.

For Jibes' crutch..

You made an assertion w/o apparent merit and then feign incredulity when asked to substantiate it

You seem to be making the further mistake of not realizing that we already have access to affordable/free birth control without forcing people to pay for it.
Somehow this is "not effective"
in what way? who knows

This post was edited by cambovenzi on Jan 19 2017 06:43am

Then how do you have this free birth control without ppl paying for it? sounds interesting.

Its free or cheap to the consumers without forcing other people to pay for it.
I am not saying that labor and other costs were never paid by anyone throughout the process of production and distribution.

That was another terrible response.
Do you have an argument or something to back up your statements somewhere? Do you plan on clarifying what you said? Or admitting your claims were wrong?