d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Trump 2016 > Trump Vs Clinton
Prev1214921502151215221533169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 492945Replies: 31684Track Topic
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
#21501
Jul 18 2018 09:09am
https://democrats-oversight.house.gov/news/press-releases/justice-department-contradicts-republican-claims-on-uranium-one

Quote
Most importantly, Justice Department officials explained that this individual never provided any evidence or made any allegations regarding Secretary Clinton or the Clinton Foundation in any of their interactions with him.

· They stated unequivocally: “at no point did [the individual] provide any allegation of corruption, illegality, or impropriety on Clinton, the Clinton Foundation, President Clinton, the Uranium One deal, or CFIUS.” They also confirmed that there were “no allegations of impropriety or illegality” regarding Secretary Clinton in any of the documents they reviewed.
Member
Posts: 92,984
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
#21502
Jul 18 2018 09:14am
Quote (Surfpunk @ Jul 18 2018 09:09am)
https://democrats-oversight.house.gov/news/press-releases/justice-department-contradicts-republican-claims-on-uranium-one


inb4 "of course the corrupt DOJ said that. the only people we can trust are those that state bullshit regularly to secure votes"
Member
Posts: 55,374
Joined: Mar 6 2006
Gold: 220.48
#21503
Jul 18 2018 09:15am
Quote (thesnipa @ Jul 18 2018 10:14am)
inb4 "of course the corrupt DOJ said that. the only people we can trust are those that state bullshit regularly to secure votes"


Well, if he wants to argue that sessions is corrupt, he won't find any complaints. That's essentially what he'll be saying if he attacks or doubts what was posted. The implications of it will probably be ignored though.

But you gotta look at the most obvious thing regardless of what you believe, if it was actually true, why isn't trump doing anything about it? is he so incompetent that he can't do something with all this "proof"?

This post was edited by Arsenic_Touch on Jul 18 2018 09:27am
Member
Posts: 5,942
Joined: Apr 29 2018
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
#21504
Jul 18 2018 09:40am
Quote (Ghot @ Jul 18 2018 10:08am)
We know this. But since Russia controls it, the could sell it anywhere.
Just giving Russia (our supposed enemy) control is treasonous.

/e I posted the original article in theHill back a few pages.. It says controlling stake, etc. It explains the whole thing.
Not only was this done, it was done with ill gotten monies, which the FBI and the DOJ knew about before the deal was made.


/ee On top of everything else, this was all gone over way back in Oct 2017, when Gooms posted this, and the two follow up articles.


I love how all of a sudden Russia is a "supposed" enemy and not an enemy like they have been for like the last 60+ years or so lol

Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,299.69
#21505
Jul 18 2018 09:43am
Quote (Horford @ Jul 18 2018 08:40am)
I love how all of a sudden Russia is a "supposed" enemy and not an enemy like they have been for like the last 60+ years or so lol


they will be an enemy again whenever a democrat gets elected

and like every other hypocritical rant and conspiracy to come at that time they will say it straight faced and with full belief
Member
Posts: 105,141
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
#21506
Jul 18 2018 12:57pm
White House briefing via Sarah Sanders.... LIVE

http://www.reuters.tv/l/htx/



/e It just ended. I gotta say she is one smart, quick and commanding presence. No one seems to be able to trip her up.

This post was edited by Ghot on Jul 18 2018 01:06pm
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
#21507
Jul 18 2018 01:34pm
I'm not sure how to feel about Congress bringing the translator in for a hearing... sounds like that sets a horrible precedent. Presidents have to be able to have confidential discussions with foreign leaders. I'd need to see some more indictments come out against Trump people before I'd support something like that.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
#21508
Jul 18 2018 01:39pm
Quote (IceMage @ Jul 18 2018 01:34pm)
I'm not sure how to feel about Congress bringing the translator in for a hearing... sounds like that sets a horrible precedent. Presidents have to be able to have confidential discussions with foreign leaders. I'd need to see some more indictments come out against Trump people before I'd support something like that.



I’m in orientation (going over a pointless “self-directed learning assessment”) so I can’t watch. What are they needing a translator for?
Member
Posts: 92,984
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
#21509
Jul 18 2018 01:42pm
Quote (IceMage @ Jul 18 2018 01:34pm)
I'm not sure how to feel about Congress bringing the translator in for a hearing... sounds like that sets a horrible precedent. Presidents have to be able to have confidential discussions with foreign leaders. I'd need to see some more indictments come out against Trump people before I'd support something like that.


i'm of the opposite mind. i'd love for 100% transparency with congressional committees, presidential meetings, etc. all on transcript. only exemptions would be war councils for obvious reasons.
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
#21510
Jul 18 2018 01:42pm
The permanent damage your president is doing to your country is dramatic ^^

Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1214921502151215221533169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact