Quote (djman72 @ Aug 3 2018 08:46am)
Well, considering there isn't any signifigant evidence of wrong doing...... You won't have to.
How is it useful to compare the two? I'm curious as to what you get out of your slanted compassion of queen Hillary and the Nazi Trump.
this is a terribly misinformed opinion sir. There was no more hard evidence against HRC to justify an 11 hour deposition than there is against Trump currently. Simply a mandate in the legislature. If the 2018 midterms go hard dem you may see another set of unnecessary circuses called by a Dem run congress, and it will be as useless as the HRC deposition and yield as little evidence usable in court. People get the false idea that Comey was wildly inappropriate in not filing charges against HRC, they think that because of the kangaroo court of opinion and slander that the congress ran on HRC for 11 hours that flooded the internet with stupid soundbytes. Make no mistake, HRC is guilty as sin, so was OJ. Doesn't mean she was an easy target to put in prison, nor is trump.
PS Icemage consistently compares the two because HRC sucks, not because he likes her. That should be painfully obvious, it's a "hes as bad as her" not "she'd do much better" comparison.
This post was edited by thesnipa on Aug 3 2018 08:54am