So what?



/e



This post was edited by Ghot on Jul 17 2018 10:30am

Bill Browder disagrees with you.

http://time.com/5340545/bill-browder-vladimir-putin-magnitsky-act-donald-trump/

So what?

/e Do you honestly think I can't Google?

This post was edited by Ghot on Jul 17 2018 10:36am

Reading is hard.

It's not reuters, so it's clearly fake news.

Actually I think you very well may lack that ability

either you lack the ability or the ability to properly read the screen from rear end head placement

just about every thread you show that research is not something you hold valuable nor are facts

yes, that's what the entire subforum knows. people post the name of a new source daily in posts and you consistently act like they didn't to avoid addressing the source or ask for a source, when the name of the news-source is right there and could be easily googled.

i know u had no self awareness, now i'm realizing you dont even have awareness of how you're perceived. you've been made fun of for this exact habit many many times, perhaps its time to get a pre-Alzheimer's check. for reference, it happened to you yesterday with Horford.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Jul 17 2018 10:43am

Everyone who think that the media today won't be filled with nay-sayers, raise their hand.

Even Reuters is on your side. You did read post #21361, right?

I gave my reasons in #21361 as to why I'm not so sure Trump fucked up. But you would have to actually read it with an open mind.



Derp. I don't see anything about Trump.

This post was edited by Ghot on Jul 17 2018 10:44am

I'm sure almost all of us actually think that since you actively avoid doing so.

its almost like you reflexively jumped on a source that was posted with no commentary, just because you kneejerk disagreed with it, a few posts after doing literally the same thing. get your head out of the sand you pitiful old man and stop shooting from the hip, that hip likely needs replacing.