no one beat your shitclown prez, ever
even bozo

imho, the Dem leadership knows they're fucked and cant really stop Kavanaugh, with the filibuster gone, a GOP majority in the senate and a candidate that is not extreme enough to have any hopes of collins or murkowski blocking him.
imho, they are just putting up a fight for show, so that they can tell their base that they tried everything in their power to stop him.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Jul 10 2018 11:09am

so what? shit tard constitution with politicized justice will end up with conservatives and usa will ban abortion?
this is american people choice so it should not be a problem rofl


This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Jul 10 2018 11:32am

france had an emperor who picked a bunch of fights too, including with the russian winter. of course france had to borrow him from corsica (when they had a revolution to replace a monarch with an emperor ) because as Santara i believe said, french men don’t win wars.

John Mccain is going to have to vote for Kavanaugh by email in his condition. Hes about an inch from death

This post was edited by EndlessSky on Jul 10 2018 11:36am

do they, in your opinion, make these 'mistakes' (?) often enough to be dismissed as 'paid shills' and 'hacks'? and if so, who pays them for their shilling, and could you name some other examples of their partisan hackery, and tell me how high you estimate the percentage of extremely biased articles vs. objective fact checking?

it seems the standard for any outlet critical of the emperor is extremely high. a single mistake, a few biased articles that trigger the cult, and you're automatically 'fake news' or 'paid shills'...

This post was edited by fender on Jul 10 2018 12:46pm

I dunno bro. I think we are WAY past "a few biased articles". This has been more like a year and a half long landslide of not only biased, but severely non-factual reporting.
IMO, all we get anymore is "a few truthful articles" in a sea of bullshyt.

oh sure, it's pure coincidence that this article got singled out but the hundreds that correctly point out trump's frequent misrepresentations and outright falsehood not. even worse, they are all 'paid shillery' now and nothing they publish can be trusted anymore...

don't get me wrong, it's fair to call them out for their bias, and this article certainly deserves it - but again, this is not what this is about, it's an orchestrated attack on every critical outlet while the administration itself and the outlets friendly to it are significantly worse when it comes to bias and truth...

heinrich screaming about american elected officials when his ancestors were those who were lockstep supporters of actual emperors and furhers

it is quite interesting and telling that the bias in "a few biased articles" always, without exception, falls to the same side, dont you think?

even quality media will from time to time publish weak or unconvincing or factually incorrect or politically biased articles, yes. you're right in that regard. but from a site that claims to be objective, to be strictly sticking with facts, one would assume the occasional bias to get distributed rather evenly over both sides of the aisle. after a certain point, it's just no longer plausible to blame sloppiness or randomness - after a certain point, the only plausible explanation is that it's a deeper pattern, a bias of the site itself.