Quote (thesnipa @ 6 Feb 2020 23:07)
You're strawmanning me. I neither thought nor meant to imply that policy wasn't important. I just wasn't at the top of the list of a bunch of important mistakes she made.
An example of a minor mistake would be the deplorables incident. While it gave a rallying cry to trump voters I don't think it moved the needle much.
that's funny, because when i replied to your passionate advocacy for another establishment centrist candidate, by pointing out that is backfired massively last time, you acted like that had nothing to do with her uninspiring establishment policies (and no, the fact that you didn't use those exact same words, and tried to be funny while saying it, does not mean that hasn't clearly been your core message - no strawmanning required).
the fact that you consistently dodge the fact that this time around, every candidate at least pretends to favour progressive policies (that you advise democrats to stay away from in order to win the elections - very reminiscent of conservative msm pundits
trying to pick their ideal opponent generously offering solutions on how to beat them), further illustrates that those suggestions aren't really half as outlandish or radical as establishment shills are trying to suggest, and actually have broad public support.
speaking of which, to support my point that her textbook establishment policies, without any real vision or change, were a massive and central detriment to her campaign, let me give you a couple of quotes:
Quote (thesnipa @ 6 Feb 2020 23:21)
Trump had ideas of a direction, but no concrete policy to back it. Hillary had the status quo as her direction which means she endorses existing policy that's already cleared the legislature. I knew 100% what to expect from an HRC presidency, whereas Trump was a wild card and likely to move legislation through EOs. I have over a 60 iq so I don't consider platitudes to be policy.
Quote (thesnipa @ 6 Feb 2020 23:28)
that's because her service in the senate has taught her its just a place where bills either die entirely or are shredded and rewritten into nothing like her campaign promises.
but whether primary or general she provided a much clearer picture of what her regime's policy would look like, a bland continuation of the Obama administration. she wouldn't even commit to scraping Obamacare, signaling she preferred incremental and minor changes to improve the existing system. the most platitudinal issue she had was probably paid family leave for pregnancies, which she didn't outline a clear plan to get through the legislature or even a forecast of what an EO would look like.
oooops!