The best part is he didnt have to make one iota of exaggeration in this speech. There was absolutely no embellishments and thats a really unfortunate situation we find ourselves in.

Just wanted to respond to a couple things.

The standard for a president's behavior has never been to compare him against the worst of his enemies. A comedian holds up Trump's bloody head as a stunt, therefore Trump is justified spitting on McCain's grave over and over, or suggesting that John Dingell is in hell? It's baffling that you would suggest Trump is some happy warrior... a year ago I'd probably think you were trolling but you've literally become Lou Dobbs. All Trump does is bitch and moan everyday, whether it's on Twitter or at a rally. He's not lighthearted about much of anything. Is retweeting a pic of Pelosi and Shumer in Muslim garb supposed to be funny? Trump's horrible character gets revealed so much that I don't even post about it anymore.

I don't know what conspiracy theories you're referring to. Sure, Russiagate was one. But it was completely valid to be suspicious about Trump and his ties to Russia, and whether the campaign colluded. His dipshit son tried and failed to collude... so pretending that it was all ridiculous is great for a Hannity segment, but contrary to the facts. Sure, the dossier was outlandish. But Trump is stupid, immoral, and weird, so the possibility that he was with some hookers in Russia wasn't that absurd. Russiagate turned out to reveal a bunch of bad behavior. Trump and his associates lied over and over about contacts/ties.

Aside from that, I don't know what conspiracies you mean. The Ukraine scandal has been confirmed. You're sort of the conspiracy theorist on that issue, weaving intricate bullshit that corrupt Ukrainians are feeding the right-wing echo chambers.

This post was edited by IceMage on Jan 23 2020 11:45pm

Yep. He will be acquitted and re-elected, because he deserves it.

You may not like Trump, and that's fine. But if you allow the constitution to be abused in order to remove Trump from office... then politicians will allow the same abuses to come after the American public.
Best course of action is just to "deal with" Trump's presidency, until it's done... like the rest of us did with Obama's.





/e














This post was edited by Ghot on Jan 24 2020 12:44am

Nobody is talking to you because our coffee tables have more insight Glot. You have zero credibility here now that we've gotten to know you.

I watched you post this post multiple times and a cry for attention. Nobody is interested. Plainly speaking I can lay on my back and piss in my mouth and be more productive.

This post was edited by Skinned on Jan 24 2020 05:34am

They said the very same thing about HClinton XD

The swamp is draining itself! All these clowns have a huge surprise when they go back and pander to their constituents for the next election cycle. The impeachment effort is a deflection from actual corruption going on with US officials through Ukrainian channels. The arguments in favor of the articles are very weak. A lot of the cited 'evidence' is 2 second clips from the house hearing of witness opinion or speculation. I find the tangential evidence spewed out by the impeachment opposition more compelling of a corruption case and investigation into Biden's son, not Biden senior. I'm assuming an investigation into Biden's son wouldn't end there, hence the MAJOR smoke and mirrors defamation campaign by the democrats as a counter move to 'protect the swamp'.

Aside from my pipe theory, when did the Ukraine hack become 'debunked', I've heard this non-stop from random democrats? I google this, and 10 'fact checking' sites come up that all claim its debunked without presenting facts. The FBI public report had a conclusion along the lines of 'the Russians are capable of such a hack, the hack originated from Eastern europe, and the hack was done on a cyrillic keyboard, the hackware use don the attack vector was shoddy. Maybe I missed a report along the way?, but seems Russia OR Ukraine OR *jsper* could have pulled the original 'hack'. Also, its hard to trust the FBI after Comey and the DOJ report on fabricated FISA court applications.

Yeah, for some... knowing Trump will be acquitted and re-elected, must be hard to deal with. But you'll get there one day... not to worry.







/e



Yeah, the Dem's modus operendi seems to be: "If you can't dazzle them will brilliance, then baffle them with bullshyt".

This post was edited by Ghot on Jan 24 2020 07:17am

McCain was a horrible anti-American scamming political leech with the Keating 5 (still a hero for his military service) and as for Dingell well, he told Trump to go to hell first, “on behalf of so many veterans”, over 3 years ago


https://mobile.twitter.com/johndingell/status/786236645741850628?lang=en

Bye Felicia.

This post was edited by Skinned on Jan 24 2020 11:06am

if you take it a step further you'd realize they did an investigation against Clinton because (both being political) they didnt have enough for impeachment. they got the "impeachable offenses" from the investigation.

whereas a president potentially strong arming a foreign govt to punish a domestic political opponent is already enough to investigate in the legislature through the impeachment process, both in the grand jury stage in the house and the actual trial in senate.

your problem is you're looking for differences (i.e. a lack of independent investigation) to maintain your biases. without actually doing the thinking part of asking whether those differences matter. probably because you read/heard somewhere about how no independent investigation was done, how that really matters, and you drank is down in one pull.