Are you arguing morality is entirely subjective?

Cheap excuse for a dodge.

Nope , asking for correct citation , something I do when I copy/paste an opinion .

whats the difference in pasting several studies without sources, and summarizing them without sources?
quite frankly, the former seems more credible



did you miss this post

This post was edited by Kamikizzle on Dec 22 2009 09:35pm

Are you seriously waiting for me to answer your ridiculous questions ?

I will bet you can not define subjective without a dictionary or google .

This post was edited by WidowMaKer_MK on Dec 22 2009 09:36pm

The positions he espoused are similar to the vast majority of the left, it's just that the left refuses to realize that the solutions they're giving to AGW will result in mass death worldwide.

Kthx.

It is bad form to use someones words without giving them credit . Especially for someone posing as scholarly .

You can't even spell ridiculous right.

If morality is dependent on the agreement of the majority, it is subjective. If what is right and proper depends on what society agrees upon, it is subjective. Both of which you have argued for.

ITT Widow deems morality independent of God's will.



Source was posted about a page before the one you quoted. Axshen asked for a few pieces from the article so he didn't have to read all ten pages. Get with the program old man, stop dodging.

This post was edited by Sioux on Dec 22 2009 09:37pm

Reality is... your only argument is that a homosexual couple makes you blush.

What was your major again?