Typically taunting police combined with attempted aggravated assault with a deadly weapon is fair grounds for lethal force.

This post was edited by SP00K on Jan 9 2026 02:13pm

Ram them with wheels turning away from officer lol. even after we get the front view your opinions are lagging behind.

From the footage you can definitely see her vehicle is still lined up with him, she's still hitting him with the corner and there's an audible collision in addition to the gunshots.
Furthermore, she was recklessly driving around her own lesbian spouse, who was trying to get in the passenger side. She left her doors locked and tried to spin off, and we can see the split second of the vehicle lurching forward as it spun out

Its about 0.05 seconds before the guy dropping his phone / reacting / screaming 'oh!' / firing his shot
Her vehicle jumped forward like a jump scare, way faster than she had been backing up, and you can see that from the opposite side videos without the context of how close it was to him already
She lurched her vehicle into him

I said it before and again after watching that video, seems like one of the worst trained people imaginable. If you think this lady is a threat of any type you go Infront of her vehicle? Then you take some wild shots one hitting way the fuck down on the fender, endangering people. Then you essentially reach in a driver side window you are so close to execute the person leaving a vehicle out of control.

What a wild showing of dumbassery.

"Don't believe your lying eyes"

Bro is a hero, after triple tapping her he calmly puts away his pistol, calls her a fucking bitch then walks over unfazed.

That is real combat training

Minnesota police, the various local departments and sheriffs and state officers, are trained for deescalation and avoiding scenarios that could lead to violence. They're trained not to step in front of a vehicle if the suspect might flee, they're trained not to pursue fleeing vehicles and simply let them go, they're trained not to enforce drug or weapon laws or stop vehicles registered to violent suspects. They're trained to avoid conflict and take a paycheck.

Federal law enforcement are trained to enforce the law and detain suspects and use the necessary force to do so.
And people who fuck around with US Marshals or ATF or FBI or ICE or BP or other officers always get amazed that they play by different rules than the MPD

I mean considering he thought to take the time to shoot, miss, shoot more, seems like there was clear other reasonable means of not shooting , since shooting would never stop a vehicle that close to you.

So the individual is either retarded, or poorly trained, or totally disregarded everything via choice because they just wanted to kill someone.

Charles Ramsey, a former Philadelphia police commissioner, told CNN that many law enforcement agencies around the country have restricted officers in their interactions with suspects in vehicles.

“You don’t reach into cars – that’s how you wind up getting dragged down the street,” Ramsey said. “You don’t stand in front or behind a car with the engine running… Policies around the country have pretty much prohibited firing at a moving car.”

lmao, yeah ill go absolutely disregarded training, guidelines and just wanted to shoot.

All those body cam videos of cops having cars pulled over which are always a flight risk, you never see people standing infront of them, the partners off to the side, no ones infront with their hand up dont leave please sir while the other talks to the driver. Its almost like common sense or training being used.

This post was edited by SBD on Jan 9 2026 02:36pm

Again those are guidelines from state officers who have been taught to prioritize deescalation, avoiding conflict and not causing incidents, over enforcing the law and protecting the public from criminals.
The feds don't play by the same rules.

There is already explicit legal precedent held by the 10th circuit that federal officers are not required to use the least intrusive means nor avoid putting themselves in danger, and are still entitled to qualified immunity if they do so. And that case dealt with a virtually identical case of a federal officer standing in front of a vehicle driven by a fleeing suspect who did a three point turn and then accelerated at the officer and got shot through the windows. I don't know how much more explicit the law could be

Who cares about the law when you're an anti-police radical ideologue who believes they don't have the right to exist?