Quote (card_sultan @ 16 May 2017 16:53)
exactly cause its all BS theory your expected to believe, look how offended you got when i questioned it, you lost it.
That's ok, every Helios worshipper of the state religion reacts the same.
They are even admitting now that black holes are mathematically impossible and they need to change their model. :rofl:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2769156/Black-holes-NOT-exist-Big-Bang-Theory-wrong-claims-scientist-maths-prove-it.htmlScientist claims she has mathematical proof black holes cannot exist
She said it is impossible for stars to collapse and form a singularity
Professor Laura Mersini-Houghton said she is still in 'shock' from the find
Previously, scientists thought stars much larger than the sun collapsed under their own gravity and formed black holes when they died
During this process they release a type of radiation called Hawking radiation
But new research claims the star would lose too much mass and wouldn't be able to form a black hole
If true, the theory that the universe began as a singularity, followed by the Big Bang, could also be wrongOmg I'm shocked! :o ......<----------Irony
1) I wasn't offended.
2) You never questioned it. If you had we would have had a better conversation. You just wrote a lot of garbled nonsense then acted superior.
3) The Big Bang Theory could well be wrong. But, it is the current best explanation for the way things are the way they are. If Professor Houghton has really found compelling evidence that could change that best explanation then scientists will welcome it as they did when they realised the universe was expanding and the big bang theory was developed.
4) However - Houghton's findings simply conclude that black holes, as we imagine them to be currently, cannot form. As far as I know (and I could of course be wrong) she has not stated that this invalidates Big Bang Theory though, of course, any big change in the way we understand astrophysics often has had implications regarding various Big Bang Theories.
Considering Houghton's findings came back in 2013 I can't imagine why the Daily Mail is doing a segment on it in 2013. But then the Daily Mail is actually a trashy tabloid magazine so I guess they print whatever, whenever to get clicks. I would suggest you go and look at her original journal article but, to be honest, it is far beyond even my above average knowledge of physics so you would likely get nothing from that excersise. As I said earlier - start with the basics and work up from there.
Newspapers, and especially tatty rags like the Mail, are notorious for their inability to accurately represent scientific studies, surveys, journal articles etc. If you are genuinely interested in learning about physics and not just mining the internet for quotes to help you validate your distrust of scientists then I do suggest you look up recommended reading lists first for calculus, algebra and differential equations and then some college textbooks for physics and take it from there. I suspect it's pretty unlikely you'll put in the effort required to know what you're talking about. If you can't be bothered to reach my level of understanding you can at least try some pop physics books from reputable physicists. One of the first physics books I read was 'Warped passages' by Lisa Randall. I fully recommend it for the layman who is interested.
This post was edited by Scaly on May 16 2017 05:52pm