d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Us Makes Up Fantasy Over Imminent Russian Invasion
Prev1205206207208209211Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Apr 7 2022 06:53pm
Quote (JessiWan @ Apr 7 2022 07:44pm)
And if Russia can provide facts? And they can show that there was harm?


Deals between sovereigns are different from a sovereign being sued by a non-sovereign.

Quote (Goomshill @ Apr 7 2022 07:51pm)
No, a person cannot sue their government for its policies save for limited waiver of sovereign immunity, as per methods like the FTCA and Westfall Act. Any case that implicates the federal government for liability is automatically dismissed, save for passing through narrowly defined claims permitted by the government. The side that is massively more powerful and has many options at its disposal has declared that tort only exists insofar as it voluntarily permits it.


More or less what I meant by "undue harm". The government can harm you by violating your guaranteed rights or through permitted liabilities. However some harms are unavoidable from living in a society and you can't really sue for those.

This post was edited by NetflixAdaptationWidow on Apr 7 2022 06:54pm
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Apr 7 2022 06:55pm
Quote (JessiWan @ Apr 7 2022 05:14pm)
It wasn't pointless, because I am not speaking in the hypothetical-- "if __ didn't happen, this war would not have happened". I want you to know that your country isn't completely blameless. And to make things more "point-ful", how about you guys try and re-think your strategies in terms of your foreign policies, so that such a war will not happen again in the future?


People respond to greed and fear. I will admit that America has not exercised the best foreign policy because we have a history of appeasing Russia. Our policy of appeasement made Russia think that the consequences of pulling the trigger wouldn't be severe. If any lesson is to be learned from this, it's that America needs to be much more aggressive both militarily and economically. It's a careful balance though because you don't want to push Russia to the point where they feel that they have nothing to lose. The ideal scenario is for them to be as isolated as North Korea.

Thankfully, Russia is going to be crippled from this endeavor. Finland will join NATO and we'll be able to place nuclear weapons a mere dozens of miles from the cultural capital of Russia: St. Petersburg. This level of fear should lead to some more appropriate behavior from such a savage country.
Member
Posts: 22,264
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
Apr 7 2022 06:55pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Apr 7 2022 05:53pm)
Deals between sovereigns are different from a sovereign being sued by a non-sovereign.


I am not gonna get into the specifics of how they resolve conflicts on the international scale. I just want to point out that when you say the more powerful one is automatically at fault is some serious communist logic. Like, seriously. The weaker ones can do no wrong. I mean, what the fuck?

This post was edited by JessiWan on Apr 7 2022 06:57pm
Member
Posts: 22,264
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
Apr 7 2022 06:56pm
Quote (thundercock @ Apr 7 2022 05:55pm)
People respond to greed and fear. I will admit that America has not exercised the best foreign policy because we have a history of appeasing Russia. Our policy of appeasement made Russia think that the consequences of pulling the trigger wouldn't be severe. If any lesson is to be learned from this, it's that America needs to be much more aggressive both militarily and economically. It's a careful balance though because you don't want to push Russia to the point where they feel that they have nothing to lose. The ideal scenario is for them to be as isolated as North Korea.

Thankfully, Russia is going to be crippled from this endeavor. Finland will join NATO and we'll be able to place nuclear weapons a mere dozens of miles from the cultural capital of Russia: St. Petersburg. This level of fear should lead to some more appropriate behavior from such a savage country.


I really hope you are joking.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Apr 7 2022 06:56pm
Quote (JessiWan @ Apr 7 2022 07:55pm)
I am not gonna get into the specifics of how they resolve conflicts on the international scale. I just want to point out that when you say the one more powerful one is automatically at fault is some serious communist logic. Like, seriously. The weaker ones can do no wrong. I mean, what the fuck?


Except I didn't say the more powerful one is automatically at fault. When the more powerful one has many more peaceful options at its disposal it can be blamed for taking the violent option.
Member
Posts: 50,682
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,886.00
Apr 7 2022 06:57pm
Quote (thundercock @ Apr 7 2022 07:55pm)
People respond to greed and fear. I will admit that America has not exercised the best foreign policy because we have a history of appeasing Russia. Our policy of appeasement made Russia think that the consequences of pulling the trigger wouldn't be severe. If any lesson is to be learned from this, it's that America needs to be much more aggressive both militarily and economically. It's a careful balance though because you don't want to push Russia to the point where they feel that they have nothing to lose. The ideal scenario is for them to be as isolated as North Korea.

Thankfully, Russia is going to be crippled from this endeavor. Finland will join NATO and we'll be able to place nuclear weapons a mere dozens of miles from the cultural capital of Russia: St. Petersburg. This level of fear should lead to some more appropriate behavior from such a savage country.


And this fervent anti-Russian policy, will it serve America's national interests? Is Russia our greatest geopolitical foe, and their loss is our gain?
Member
Posts: 22,264
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
Apr 7 2022 06:57pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Apr 7 2022 05:56pm)
Except I didn't say the more powerful one is automatically at fault. When the more powerful one has many more peaceful options at its disposal it can be blamed for taking the violent option.


But you don't get to choose for Russia whether they have more peaceful options or not.
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Apr 7 2022 07:01pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Apr 7 2022 05:57pm)
And this fervent anti-Russian policy, will it serve America's national interests? Is Russia our greatest geopolitical foe, and their loss is our gain?


I wouldn't say that Russia is our "greatest" geopolitical foe but there really isn't hope for them until Putin is dead. Their loss is absolutely our gain.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Apr 7 2022 07:04pm
Quote (JessiWan @ Apr 7 2022 07:57pm)
But you don't get to choose for Russia whether they have more peaceful options or not.


I had no other option but to hit my wife. You don't get to choose if I have peaceful options or not.
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Apr 7 2022 07:06pm
Quote (JessiWan @ 8 Apr 2022 02:34)
I wasn't trying to say which country is the more powerful or abusive one, or whatever. I was trying to show that when one tries to assign blame, there are usually many factors involved. It's not as simple as thundercock makes it out to be. It's not a matter of, "ok so the one who pulled the trigger is the one we blame".


nobody denies that russia's neighbours seeking nato membership (why could they possibly want that, lol?) is something pootin doesn't like. of course he doesn't. he thinks he has the right to determine how other sovereign nations conduct their foreign affairs, he acts like russia has some kind of legitimate claim on ukrainian territory.

we can acknowledge that, but that does NOT mean we have to agree with that position and act like it's a legitimate one - and every halfway intelligent person will come to the conclusion that those claims and ambitions are illegitimate. what ukraine does is solely up to the ukrainian people. it's a sovereign country, recognised by the entire world as such. every halfway intelligent person (and that includes pootin himself) also knows that the alleged fear of NATO invading russia is complete bullshit. no one in their right mind would attack the country with the largest nuclear arsenal in the world, and pootin KNOWS that, 100%.

so yes, russia is unhappy with ukraine, unhappy with the west, but that does NOT mean that therefore they have ANY right to attack / invade the country, or that they don't deserve the blame for it.

let's say you really want to have a dog, and you get one, even though you know your neighbour hates dogs. it might not be the most neighbourly thing to do, and one would understand if they're upset about it, but it's ultimately your decision. they don't have ANY right, legally or morally, to just kill your dog, or even you - and if they did, no one in their right mind would suggest you deserve part of the blame, simply for getting a dog even though your neighbour hates them. it's your right to decide what you do with your life, and i don't see why you wouldn't grant that same right to ukrainians...
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1205206207208209211Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll