Quote (ThatAlex @ Jun 26 2018 10:30am)
The office of the President has the authority to make travel bans. I thought this was a pretty slamdunk case.
To my understanding, the SCOTUS ruled on the authority aspect of the travel ban and not on the ban's soundness. They are going to leave that to the lower courts.
Was Trump's travel ban motivated by religious hostility? Probably, but that sentiment was no where to be found in this version of the exectutive order, and I don't know enough about law to know how much you can read into separate public statements and political motivations when examining a particular law or executive order/memorandum.
That’s essentially what is was. The prosecutors argued that it was a religious ban, because they claimed that’s what Trump said it was. Then they laid out each time Trump stated this, & each time a member of the cabinet reaffirmed it. The other side said ya know, while that is indeed true, it’s never explicitly spelled out like that in the actual framework of the EO.