Quote (lodd222 @ Sep 3 2022 02:57pm)

its not stupid its intentional. the bush florida recount was too close for Cheney.

my 1st semester @ oxford i was unpleasantly surprised to find out that many of my "friends" admitted they edited their entire highschool grade history via the lack of security in a new computer age.
they were actually getting paid to change others' if the price was right. was real life botting & trolling the system @ its finest.

Quote (TiStuff @ 5 Sep 2022 10:17)

MEMES OF THE DAY - WE ARE BACK BABY!!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/80DLo7TkxqAL/

Quote (BaHgerAUT @ Sep 5 2022 01:20am)

You're like an advertising poster for bitchute.

Quote

"As a function of Plaintiff's former position as President of the United States, the stigma associated with the subject seizure is in a league of its own," Cannon wrote. "A future indictment, based to any degree on property that ought to be returned, would result in reputational harm of a decidedly different order of magnitude."
Cannon ordered that a third-party attorney, from outside the government, be brought in to review the materials that were taken from Trump's home and resort in Florida. It also halts the Justice Department from continuing its review of the materials seized from Mar-a-Lago "pending completion of the special master's review or further Court order."

Quote (Goomshill @ Sep 5 2022 10:01am)

Here's the judge's ruling;

https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/05/politics/read-trump-special-master-mar-a-lago-decision/index.html

Quote (Goomshill @ Sep 5 2022 10:01am)

Here's the judge's ruling;

https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/05/politics/read-trump-special-master-mar-a-lago-decision/index.html

Quote (thundercock @ Sep 5 2022 01:20pm)

As dumb as Trump's legal arguments are, it's probably for the best from an optics standpoint. I don't think it's a big deal because they will come to the same conclusion as the FBI taint team. I'd be surprised if DOJ appealed this ruling because it's not in their interest to drag this on for months and months.

My only concern is if this halts DNI's review from a national security standpoint. I don't think it will because I don't think there is any legal justification for Trump having ownership of any document that relates to national security.