Quote (D_urRRR @ 8 Nov 2020 19:23)
It'll make it to Supreme court, take PA for example, literally going against state law and the Supreme court literally had to say something.
Their is a massive amount of evidence, and yes they are ALL avoiding it. The lefties do not care about our country, any form of life including their own, and sure as hell could care less about a proper election.
It will hit the circuits for a moment, but ultimately it's going to go to the Supreme Court you're probably right. It does seem like something really fishy happened, the numbers don't really add up and then once you deep dive into Dominion you have two things to think about.
1. If there was a glitch, but only in certain counties that heavily influenced the swing states and the glitch ONLY went in favor of one candidate, well then that isn't a glitch.
2. It was a glitch, and there will be no issues to find. I can accept that if validated, but WHY is does Pelosi and Fienstien's husband own stock in Dominion parent companies and why is the Clinton Foundation donating 2.3m dollars to Dominion to combat "fair elections" when you can go onto the Texas government website and see that Texas denied Dominion voting systems, and shared the denial letter about all the vulnerabilities and centralized access remotely. Is that not a conflict of interest in fair elections? Is the evidence not clear that Dominion voting systems which were installed in many of these counties in question just between 2018-2019 before the election are vulnerable, so why were these chosen to be used prior to the election?
Texas link:
https://www.sos.texas.gov/elections/laws/dominion.shtmlThis post was edited by Jere on Nov 8 2020 07:39pm