d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Forced Vaccinations For Children?
Prev1192021222347Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 52,041
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,933.00
Feb 11 2015 10:44am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Feb 11 2015 10:40am)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsTR6DYzPvI

Good video on why getting a flu shot helps even if the shot isn't very effective. Jist is that raising immunity of most people helps the flu burn out by giving it fewer chances to propagate. Since the flu, on average, gets spread to 1.2 people per person infected, even a 28% effective vaccine can be the difference between exponential infection and burn-out.


Perhaps you should follow the link I posted earlier to major studies demonstrating that flu vaccines increase deaths amongst the elderly.
Member
Posts: 10,566
Joined: May 31 2013
Gold: 0.76
Feb 11 2015 10:51am
Quote (Thor123422 @ 11 Feb 2015 11:40)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsTR6DYzPvI

Good video on why getting a flu shot helps even if the shot isn't very effective. Jist is that raising immunity of most people helps the flu burn out by giving it fewer chances to propagate. Since the flu, on average, gets spread to 1.2 people per person infected, even a 28% effective vaccine can be the difference between exponential infection and burn-out.



My Dr. insists that I get one every year, and knock on wood I really haven't had any bad cases of the flu since I started
Member
Posts: 64,732
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
Feb 11 2015 10:55am
Quote (Santara @ Feb 11 2015 10:44am)
Perhaps you should follow the link I posted earlier to major studies demonstrating that flu vaccines increase deaths amongst the elderly.


I haven't been keeping up with the read, but I'll give it a look I guess.

Let's see, sharylattkisson.com, I am immediately suspicious. Doesn't look like a reputable source so far.

Uses mainstream in quotes for some reason....

Not actually posting the evidence, just saying "This is what I heard"

Links the study, that's nice.

http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=486407 Study link

Read over the study, and basically it's a good first investigation, but is in no way conclusive. P value was .8, which is absolutely not conclusive, same for P values of 0.4 and 0.3. Not nearly enough to establish any kind of cause, and barely enough to say there's a solid relationship. Honestly I don't even understand why it was published in the first place. They aren't controlling for flu mutations from year to year, or really anything.


Overall, this study is just a "first glance" at the data and needs a much more in-depth analysis to be conclusive.
Member
Posts: 73,262
Joined: Dec 16 2011
Gold: 277,740.50
Feb 11 2015 11:09am

Quote (Valhalls_Sun @ Feb 11 2015 11:51am)
The thing that does bother me is it's not the parent who will be in peril it's the child's life that they are making their "point for liberty for."

The thing is if the kids are going to attend public school they have to produce a record of proper utd. vaccinations



Those parents are not refusing vaccination for the "liberty for", they do it, even they wrong, to protect there kids. You should get more information about anti-vaccination movements if you are aware that they are dangerous for kids health.

The vaccination rate has reach a level that can hardly be increased, also this rate is considerate as enough safe by specialists. The arguments i see from anti-vaccin people often turn around paranoia (pharma companies, etc...), mandatorate vaccination may lead to reinforce there paranoia and lower the actual vaccination rate.







Member
Posts: 77,661
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 500.00
Feb 11 2015 11:11am
Quote (Santara @ Feb 11 2015 11:44am)
Perhaps you should follow the link I posted earlier to major studies demonstrating that flu vaccines increase deaths amongst the elderly.


why do you keep battling main stream science and look for extremist weirdos that say whatever you want them to say and point to that as solid evidence of anything
Member
Posts: 53,538
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 11,407.33
Feb 11 2015 12:04pm
"You bring the syringe, I'll bring my .45 and we'll see who makes a bigger hole." – Michael Badnarik on forced vaccination
Member
Posts: 64,732
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
Feb 11 2015 12:12pm
Quote (duffman316 @ Feb 11 2015 11:11am)
why do you keep battling main stream science and look for extremist weirdos that say whatever you want them to say and point to that as solid evidence of anything


Because it's been shown at least a dozen times he doesn't read for comprehension, just for confirmation. If he had even just read the conclusion he would have seen this.

Quote
Conclusions We attribute the decline in influenza-related mortality among people aged 65 to 74 years in the decade after the 1968 pandemic to the acquisition of immunity to the emerging A(H3N2) virus. We could not correlate increasing vaccination coverage after 1980 with declining mortality rates in any age group. Because fewer than 10% of all winter deaths were attributable to influenza in any season, we conclude that observational studies substantially overestimate vaccination benefit.


and known the study being quoted didn't conclude an increase in mortality due to vaccines, only that vaccination isn't as effective as claimed.

Though this study is a good first-look, it's not anything conclusive because it doesn't account for the variation in interactivity the flu can have from year to year, and doesn't take into account that flu shots are basically a "best guess" to counteract the strongest of several strains of flu which will be floating around in any given year.

Funny thing is, he will dismiss anything with "meta analysis" in the title outright, but when this is in the conclusion

Quote
Accurate assessment of the seasonal impact of influenza on mortality is a difficult task. The diagnosis of influenza virus infection is rarely confirmed in the laboratory, and influenza infection is often cleared before onset of the secondary complications that actually cause a patient’s death.1,2 Consequently, influenza-related mortality must be determined indirectly, using statistical models that estimate the winter-seasonal excess of either pneumonia and influenza (P&I) or all-cause mortality above a baseline of expected mortality (Figure 1).3- 8 The study of trends in influenza-related mortality over time is further complicated both by substantial season-to-season variation in the number of deaths—0 to 70 000 since 19687,8 —and by the fact that mortality is much higher in seasons dominated by influenza A(H3N2) viruses than in seasons dominated by influenza B and A(H1N1) viruses.5


he doesn't bat an eye, when they're telling you what complicates the study.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Feb 11 2015 12:14pm
Member
Posts: 10,566
Joined: May 31 2013
Gold: 0.76
Feb 11 2015 12:27pm
Quote (cambovenzi @ 11 Feb 2015 13:04)
"You bring the syringe, I'll bring my .45 and we'll see who makes a bigger hole." – Michael Badnarik on forced vaccination


depends on what's in the syringe, people live from bullet wounds. -_-

Quote (2sexy4u @ 11 Feb 2015 12:09)
Those parents are not refusing vaccination for the "liberty for", they do it, even they wrong, to protect there kids. You should get more information about anti-vaccination movements if you are aware that they are dangerous for kids health.

The vaccination rate has reach a level that can hardly be increased, also this rate is considerate as enough safe by specialists. The arguments i see from anti-vaccin people often turn around paranoia (pharma companies, etc...), mandatorate vaccination may lead to reinforce there paranoia and lower the actual vaccination rate.




But they aren't dangerous to kids health, not getting the vaccines has a higher risk of harm than getting the vaccine
Member
Posts: 91,061
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,504.69
Feb 11 2015 12:32pm
Quote (Valhalls_Sun @ Feb 11 2015 09:51am)
The thing that does bother me is it's not the parent who will be in peril it's the child's life that they are making their "point for liberty for."

The thing is if the kids are going to attend public school they have to produce a record of proper utd. vaccinations


any and all diseases that can spread to other children should be vaccinated for i agree. But thats a related issue not the issue at hand.

If a parent wants to not get their kid vaccinated and homeschool them that should be their right. If they want to shove them into a public school thats a safety factor, and they should have to get the shots.

I just dont want the US to have a legal code like NY City and have everything imaginable regulated. Common sense or parental safety issues shouldnt be legislated thats just bad law.

Now if a parents negligent and irresponsible behavior results in damage to their child thats another matter. But its entirely possible and therefore should be legal to raise your child in a bubble vaccination free if thats your choice.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Feb 11 2015 12:33pm
Member
Posts: 73,262
Joined: Dec 16 2011
Gold: 277,740.50
Feb 11 2015 12:42pm
Quote (Valhalls_Sun @ Feb 11 2015 02:27pm)

But they aren't dangerous to kids health, not getting the vaccines has a higher risk of harm than getting the vaccine


i didn't mean if you consider vaccines as dangerous, i mean if you consider anti-vaccine movement as dangerous.

Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1192021222347Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll