vs

there is a lot of discussion on why they do it and how long it has been done, tested out, and played with....I posted some of them don't mean I agree with them...I posted the reasons why they do this that I believe...

first you claim all false and just condensation ....now skeptical?
Soo skeptical means your mind is not made up on this subject soo now you do not deny but skeptical?

I never claimed it was false. I pointed out that we know that the process of combustion produces visible trails in the sky, and that if you want to establish that additional chemicals are being deployed you can't use these visible trails as evidence as they would exist whether or not additional chemicals are being added. What is so hard to understand about that?

Now that being said, I would be willing to wager everything I own vs $1 that the chemtrail conspiracy is paranoid delusion. Why? Because everything I have ever seen about it comes from people who make statements that smack of bullshit. Furthermore they contradict themselves constantly, making the story internally inconsistent.

This post was edited by Azrad on Apr 4 2013 05:57pm

Well like all skeptics i have met when they actually look into it instead of argue over it they quickly change their minds...You seem no less educated then those other skeptical people

the Washington state department of health had a sample of something they sprayed http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FV3HciJpbYA
over Oakville

after it was gone the management said don't ask, when microbiologist Mike Mcdowell asked what happened to his sample..people will guess what it is that is why you hear so many theories about chem trails

soo once people start guessing what it can be you decide it is nothing? Because you hear so many theories? that is not very intelligent if you ask me, and that's why I say you not telling the truth, because I believe you smarter then that.

Guy claims he found mysterious goo filled with bacteria on ground and loses the sample. You have jumped to the following conclusions:

1. He is telling the truth.
2. That his appraisal of what is was is accurate (since this can never be double checked as he has lost the sample).
3. That is came from a plane, he never mentioned it coming from a plane, found it on the ground, it could have come from anywhere. Some people said it came in a rainstorm. All kinds of crazy shit has rained out of the sky, long before the invention of airplanes.

If you don't think I'm telling the truth, you can go fuck yourself.