All you've said is, IT'S WRONG CUZ SEX OFFENDERS EXIST. I have seen zero arguments as to why the presence of a man in a public restroom is hurtfull to a child.





Edit: except if we assume that all men are potential sexoffenders.

This post was edited by hATemOnkEy on Apr 26 2011 11:45am

...what you mean is no arguments you will accept because plenty have been given !

I must have read over them then. Because all I've seen is hysteria about potential sex offenders.

Kindly point out some of the other arguments out of the multitude that I've blatantly overlooked.

And let's not forget, since most children who are raped know their offenders, it's probably not such a good idea for children to be using the bathroom in their own home either. All children need to have their own private bathroom that has retinal scanners so that neither their parents nor their neighbors can possibly enter that room.

This is a win statement.

I can understand protecting our young from potential harm, but it appears in arguing for the protection of young females some have lost sight of the obvious: by the same argument little boys go unprotected by our current bathroom standards.

...the potential for harm to the child far outweighs any argument for a mans " right " to piss and shit in the same room as a minor female .

I hope that's clear enough !

Your half-baked attempt at a rebuttal is akin to the old "throwing the kid out with the bathwater". Nice try though.

There is so much potential for harm in this world, that all things considered, it's best not to have children at all. Seriously Widow, how could you bring children in this dangerous world full of booboo's.


And again. I was looking for ANOTHER argument than 'OH GAWD SOMEONE MIGHT POINT A PENOR IN THE DIRECTION OF A CHILD'. Cuz you know, I thought you said there were plenty of arguments...

more children die in car accidents than get raped in a public bathroom. Did you drive your kids around?