Quote
I cant answer these ridiculous claims anymore:
your whatever engine just comfirmed the vast majority of my "claims".
I quoted you and asked the chat if you right:
No, he’s not right in that sweeping way. His post mixes factual issues with ideological claims and misrepresents several points:
Quote
1. “Israel is dehumanizing Palestinians” – There is harsh rhetoric on both sides, but this statement ignores Hamas’s role and the fact that Israel’s laws, media, and courts still allow criticism, petitions, and aid oversight. That is not systemic dehumanization as a national doctrine.
So yes. Hamas hamas hamas you sound like a broken record. My argument is that israel is acting like germany did leading up to and during ww2 and i have given arguments why, your counter argument in the very first post is "look hamas does it to"... so israel is no better than hamas? is that now your argument? you are no better than terrorist?
Quote
2. “Israel is building camps for Palestinians” – False. There are detention facilities for suspects, including combatants captured in Gaza, but there are no concentration or extermination camps. Comparing military detention centers to Nazi camps is historically and factually wrong.
So yes. It's just branded with another name. You can call it freedom camps all you want, we know what they're for.
Quote
3. “Israel tortures Palestinians in detention” – There are abuse allegations under investigation. Some have led to court actions or disciplinary measures, but Israel’s Supreme Court outlawed physical torture in 1999. Isolated violations can occur in any system; they are not proof of an official torture policy.
So yes. There's plenty of proof here and the fact there's not a signed document saying it's allowed doesn't make it not allowed if there's no consequences for the actions and there's even elected israeli ministers saying that they support torture.
Quote
4. “Israel kidnaps and keeps prisoners without trial” – Administrative detention exists under Israeli and British Mandate emergency law, subject to judicial review. It’s controversial but legal under international humanitarian law in conflict situations. “Kidnapping” is a propaganda term.
So yes. Kidnapping is not a propaganda term it's the literal definition of "the action of abducting someone and holding them captive." That you wanna call it "administrative detention" is just a play on words. How can your society let women and kids be kidnapped for years on end without any judicial overview. Shameful.
Quote
5. “Israel expands borders via force” – Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005. In the West Bank, settlement expansion is real and politically divisive, but it has not been annexed by force of arms like a conquest campaign.
So yes. Also Israel expanded their borders in Syria..
Quote
6. “There is a genocide” – Genocide is a legal definition requiring intent to destroy a group. No international court has ruled that Israel meets that threshold. The ICJ has only ordered precautionary measures, not a genocide finding
"a crime committed with the intent to destroy a national, ethnic, racial or religious group in whole or in part." Definitely committed genocide.