Quote (thesnipa @ Dec 14 2022 06:00pm)
ideological opposition to china for me is simple, and revolves around a single issue, a future world wide govt and overrides regional sovereignty. at which time it will be driven by chinese or western ideology.
at some point in the future a UN-esque but on steroids governmental body will rule the earth. in order to make this happen it cannot operate like the UN security council. that organization is a loosely connected group of ideologically separated countries all tied by a single factor, having nuclear arms. and these ideological differences are the driving force behind the lack of direction and pragmatic action for the organization.
some time in the future, 150 or 200 years from now, we will have an Earth govt. countries will become states, states will become cities, and cities will have next to no power. at which time china can lot be allowed to steer the world govt's direction. we're on a dark path as a world, both chinese and western govts are not looking good, but the western direction is the only one that offers a slim chance of individual freedom and financial autonomy on that time scale.
thx for posting, again, i broadly agree with all this. the only caveat i have is that "western" ideology and accepted norms are eroding and therefore its difficult to tell which ideology, long term, will provide the most social freedoms etc.
Quote (Meanwhile @ Dec 14 2022 06:00pm)
In retrospect I can agree with your framing (but I would challenge that its broadly the same thing). Ultimately China is on one side of the world and the US is on the other. China has not moved its military might directly to surround the US (they dont have that capability) but rather the US has moved its military might to surround China (because the US has that capability). If this is a direct response to an event carried out by China, then I would suggest we tease that out.
This post was edited by ferdia on Dec 14 2022 12:11pm