d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Hate Crimes
Prev123457Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 22,437
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 96.11
Dec 9 2022 07:56pm
Quote (Ghot @ Dec 9 2022 05:54pm)
The ONLY evidence for "intent" would be a mind reader who was present when the crime was being committed.

I know there's charges with names like... assault with intent to kill or to harm. But they don't mean intent the way you mean it.
Intent to harm would be a way to differentiate someone who punches another person, or takes a bat to them.
Just like intent to kill would be describing someone who used a knife or a gun.


Nah, there have been people who, because of their own testimony and/or writings, have shared that there was intention to target someone because they were perceived to be part of an actual group.
Member
Posts: 105,132
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Dec 9 2022 07:57pm
Quote (Handcuffs @ Dec 9 2022 08:50pm)
Not at all. If anyone were to intentionally target a White person for murder because of their Whiteness, then it should (and does) qualify as a hate crime.





YES. In the so rare I've not heard of it... case where a gunman had a group of mixed races and ONLY shot the white people... that could be construed as a hate crime.
Member
Posts: 22,437
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 96.11
Dec 9 2022 07:58pm
Quote (Ghot @ Dec 9 2022 05:57pm)
YES. In the so rare I've not heard of it... case where a gunman had a group of mixed races and ONLY shot the white people... that could be construed as a hate crime.


I don't think we're in disagreement then.
Member
Posts: 105,132
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Dec 9 2022 07:58pm
Quote (Handcuffs @ Dec 9 2022 08:56pm)
Nah, there have been people who, because of their own testimony and/or writings, have shared that there was intention to target someone because they were perceived to be part of an actual group.




You can use admission in a court of law, but it's not really "proof". The charged could be lying, to grab optics or some stupid shyt.
Member
Posts: 105,132
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Dec 9 2022 07:59pm
Quote (Handcuffs @ Dec 9 2022 08:58pm)
I don't think we're in disagreement then.




Yeah we are. In 66 years I've never heard of a crime like that.


Before, say... the 50's or 60's... maybe. But that's 60 years ago... now.

This post was edited by Ghot on Dec 9 2022 08:00pm
Member
Posts: 22,264
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
Dec 9 2022 08:00pm
Quote (Handcuffs @ Dec 9 2022 05:49pm)
There is, if there's evidence of it. No different than any other element of the case.


How will you be able to prove that someone killed a black person because he was black though. I mean it's possible that he yelled "n*gger" as he killed the victim, but not all cases are open and shut like this. I think it would be very difficult for a prosecutor to prove a racist intent. Most modern day Americans are very acutely aware of the pitfalls of being considered a racist and they will try hard to avoid it.

With regular murder cases, it is less difficult to prove premeditation. For example, if someone bought poison and then put it in food to kill someone. Or if someone purchased a gun, and then brought it to the place where he killed the victim. But proving racist intent is much much more difficult, imo.

Quote (Handcuffs @ Dec 9 2022 05:50pm)
Not at all. If anyone were to intentionally target a White person for murder, then it should (and does) qualify as a hate crime.


The implication of this is that anytime someone got murdered, we have to investigate to see whether it's a hate crime, and whether he/she was targeted because of their race. Doesn't sound like a good way to approach a problem.
Member
Posts: 22,437
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 96.11
Dec 9 2022 08:04pm
Quote (Ghot @ Dec 9 2022 05:59pm)
Yeah we are. In 66 years I've never heard of a crime like that.


There's plenty of case examples:

Quote
On Thursday, a judge in Lane County sentenced Nolan Strauss to 16 years in federal prison and five years of supervised release for stabbing Ronnell Hughes, a Black man, at an Arby's restaurant in Eastern Oregon in 2019. He had faced a maximum sentence of life in prison.

According to court documents, when the worker asked why Strauss stabbed the man, he replied "Because he was Black, and I don't like Black people." Court documents also say Strauss told detectives he was sitting in his truck "foolin' around with the idea" about hurting someone when he saw Hughes walk inside. Strauss also said his actions were "sort of religiously motivated" and "pretty racist" and admitted to not knowing the victim.

https://www.kgw.com/article/news/crime/eastern-oregon-hate-crime-sentencing/283-beaf0a0d-7d0a-4f0f-88f5-bdc5ca290f6c
Member
Posts: 22,437
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 96.11
Dec 9 2022 08:05pm
Quote (JessiWan @ Dec 9 2022 06:00pm)
How will you be able to prove that someone killed a black person because he was black though. I mean it's possible that he yelled "n*gger" as he killed the victim, but not all cases are open and shut like this. I think it would be very difficult for a prosecutor to prove a racist intent. Most modern day Americans are very acutely aware of the pitfalls of being considered a racist and they will try hard to avoid it.


See my reply to Ghot in post #27.
Member
Posts: 22,264
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
Dec 9 2022 08:07pm
Quote (Handcuffs @ Dec 9 2022 06:04pm)


This case is easy because the killer admitted to being a racist. But not all cases are like this, in fact, I bet most racially motivated killers will be very careful and try not to appear racist because they know the sentencing would be harsher.
Member
Posts: 22,437
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 96.11
Dec 9 2022 08:08pm
Quote (JessiWan @ Dec 9 2022 06:07pm)
This case is easy because the killer admitted to being a racist.


Correct.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev123457Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll