Sorry? Can you find one example of me doing this I have been here since summer.


The answer is no slither back into your hole snake.

This post was edited by YeeHaw on Dec 3 2022 03:13am

I've started using twitter again. Go Elon

Would like a few more features on it, less ads and so and so but its a good app.

This post was edited by TidsL on Dec 3 2022 04:00am

We had to know from the outward facing corruption that the stuff going on behind the scenes that we didn't see, was more blatant. So yeah, Twitter was in direct collusion with the Biden campaign to censor both the Hunter Biden laptop story and directly censor critics of Biden leading up to the election for the explicit purpose of trying to help Biden win, even when twitter staff knew it didn't even have a pretense of legitimacy. And of course the most involved actor was James Baker, who goes from being general consul to the FBI while the FBI was corruptly abusing its powers to try to rig the 2016 election against Donald Trump by spying on him and leaking the results- to becoming the general consul for Twitter during the 2020 election and again trying to abuse the powers they had, including again having the FBI spy on Tara Reade's twitter account and censoring Biden's critics. And of course, guess which law firm was involved in all three stories? Perkins Coie


So I have a simple challenge for anyone who still pretends this doesn't stink to high heaven: What possible legitimate purpose could the FBI have for subpoenaing Tara Reade's private twitter communications after she publicly accused Joe Biden of sexually assaulting her?

This post was edited by Goomshill on Dec 3 2022 05:09am

Why was the white house censoring speech on Twitter back then?
Does that make no one mad?

Simple question is twitter the news?

https://www.thebulwark.com/no-you-do-not-have-a-constitutional-right-to-post-hunter-bidens-dick-pic-on-twitter/

Best take on this. Last sentence provides some lulz.

In short, the Biden team requesting that Hunter Biden dick pics be removed from Twitter, and Twitter complying, as they complied with requests from the Trump team(which represented the president) to remove content, is a non-story.

And, the contrarian substacker himself says that there's no evidence the government was involved in Twitter's censoring the Hunter Biden laptop story.

So I'm looking at a well-done nothingburger here.

10% for the big guy.... Yea, hunters laptop was totally just about his dick pics and not the banging of underage girls, bursima, Ukraine, ect. Simpleton.

So it's debunked again, again, and again.

But we already knew about Hunter's laptop, these Twitter "revelations" don't actually reveal anything new that is interesting.

LOL Matt Taibbi. Not only was Biden not the president on October 24, 2020, but he wasn't even the President-elect yet. The campaign asking to have dick pics removed ≠ government censorship. And yes, you can find the image by searching the Wayback Machine for the URLs in the first post, and pulling up the snapshot of the date.

Even better...it was structural separation which Twitter already had in place.

https://twitter.com/WillOremus/status/1598884032745725952

This post was edited by Surfpunk on Dec 3 2022 12:28pm