Tulsi a hero for speaking out against insane anti-White racism for which the left-wing fascists "democrats" have become the faces of & home for

any sane person would like to dump these inhuman violence-inciting scumbags that are free of any consequences

You have posted that meme like 300 times.. we all get it

She used to be pretty hot.

Democrats just lost their top Russian asset. While others waged war based on speculation from their arm chairs Tulsi went boots on ground to meet with Assad. While others baited the race card, Tulsi head shot them with rhetorical merit based bliss.

This post was edited by RedFromWinter on Oct 12 2022 03:21pm

It is the party which has moved away from Tulsi, not the other way round. Her bashing the direction of the party does not automatically prove that her own politcs have fundamentally changed. Aside from the gay marriage stuff, which is a really minor policy issue in the grand scheme of things, you haven't given any examples of her policy positions actually changing.

Regarding Cheney: recently, she's even going off on a mild-mannered, non-populist mainstream Republican like Glenn Youngkin for the sole reason that he dared to campaign with Kari Lake in Arizona. To Cheney, any Republican who doesn't treat election deniers as total pariahs becomes a pariah himself. Yet she happily sits on the Jan 6 committee together with Democrat Bennie Thompson, who objected the certification of Ohio's results in favor of GWB in 2004, and with Democrat Jamie Raskin, who objected the certification of 10 electors from Florida in favor of Trump in 2016. Therefore, I can't take anyone seriously who claims that Cheney is a principled TrUe CoNsErVaTiVe. She's a massive hypocrite who can't stomach that her party moved away from her; and with that, we have come full circle back to the Tulsi situation.



----------


https://january6th.house.gov/about/membership
https://archive.ph/YS0Vo
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/sep/21/lee-zeldin/house-democrats-have-objected-presidential-electio/

Not even gonna bother when you aren't gonna be honest. I already gave you a specific example of her flip flopping on policy. Seems like you aren't even interested in the situation. Just responding with talking points like a hack.

Your Cheney crap is just more of the same. Democrats objecting isn't the same as a systemic attempt by the ruling party to undermine the electoral process. Trump STILL hasn't conceded the election and Cruz is STILL defending his objection even after dozens of audits prove they are full of shit.

Hack

This post was edited by NetflixAdaptationWidow on Oct 12 2022 04:03pm

Supporting the legality of gay marriage while also opposing the government sexually propagandizing very young children in schools is not a flip flop. Its a consistent position and the correct one.

Anyone with a hint of intelligence and honesty can admit the democrat party has dramatically changed over the past 10-20 years.

This post was edited by cambovenzi on Oct 12 2022 04:10pm

didn't the entire radical left-wing fascist "progressive" scammer caucus just betray their gullible imbecile base by flip flopping on medicare for all by refusing to force the vote on it ... while being elected on medicare for all campaign promises ??

keep up the hateful vitriol attacks on things that you let slide in an eye blink for the rotten trash you worship



undeniable facts are on their side, sorry

social media giant Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg has confessed that FBI rigged the 2020 election by instructing social media giants to BLACKLIST a FACTUAL story of Biden family corruption via selling access to the white house for personal gain

furthermore, a cabal of government agents is now caught in a scheme to rig the election & betray their country by running a disinformation campaign against a sitting United States president in order to steal his second presidential term:
(the left-wing fascist "Democrat" party is yet to persecute any of the treasonous scumbags)



Mike Hayden, former CIA director, now analyst for CNN: Didn’t respond.

Jim Clapper, former director of national intelligence, now CNN pundit: “Yes, I stand by the statement made AT THE TIME, and would call attention to its 5th paragraph. I think sounding such a cautionary note AT THE TIME was appropriate.”

Leon Panetta, former CIA director and defense secretary, now runs a public policy institute at California State University: Declined comment.

John Brennan, former CIA director, now analyst for NBC and MSNBC: Didn’t respond.

Thomas Fingar, former National Intelligence Council chair, now teaches at Stanford University: Didn’t respond.

Rick Ledgett, former National Security Agency deputy director, now a director at M&T Bank: Didn’t respond.

John McLaughlin, former CIA acting director, now teaches at Johns Hopkins University: Didn’t respond.

Michael Morell, former CIA acting director, now at George Mason University: Didn’t respond.

Mike Vickers, former defense undersecretary for intelligence, now on board of BAE Systems: Didn’t respond.

Doug Wise, former Defense Intelligence Agency deputy director, teaches at University of New Mexico: Didn’t respond.

Nick Rasmussen, former National Counterterrorism Center director, now executive director, Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism: Didn’t respond.

Russ Travers, former National Counterterrorism Center acting director: “The letter explicitly stated that we didn’t know if the emails were genuine, but that we were concerned about Russian disinformation efforts. I spent 25 years as a Soviet/Russian analyst. Given the context of what the Russians were doing at the time (and continue to do — Ukraine being just the latest example), I considered the cautionary warning to be prudent.”

Andy Liepman, former National Counterterrorism Center deputy director: “As far as I know I do [stand by the statement] but I’m kind of busy right now.”

John Moseman, former CIA chief of staff: Didn’t respond.

Larry Pfeiffer, former CIA chief of staff, now senior advisor to The Chertoff Group:
Didn’t respond.

Jeremy Bash, former CIA chief of staff, now analyst for NBC and MSNBC: Didn’t respond.

Rodney Snyder, former CIA chief of staff: Didn’t respond.

Glenn Gerstell, former National Security Agency general counsel: Didn’t respond.

David Priess, former CIA analyst and manager: “Thank you for reaching out. I have no further comment at this time.”

Pam Purcilly, former CIA deputy director of analysis: Didn’t respond.

Marc Polymeropoulos, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.

Chris Savos, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.

John Tullius, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.

David A. Vanell, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.

Kristin Wood, former CIA senior intelligence officer, now non-resident fellow, Harvard: Didn’t respond.

David Buckley, former CIA inspector general: Didn’t respond.

Nada Bakos, former CIA analyst and targeting officer, now senior fellow, Foreign Policy Research Institute: Didn’t respond.

Patty Brandmaier, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.

James B. Bruce, former CIA senior intelligence office: Didn’t respond.

David Cariens, former CIA intelligence analyst: Didn’t respond.

Janice Cariens, former CIA operational support officer: Didn’t respond.

Paul Kolbe, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.

Peter Corsell, former CIA analyst: Didn’t respond.

Brett Davis, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.

Roger Zane George, former national intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.

Steven L. Hall, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.

Kent Harrington, former national intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.

Don Hepburn, former national security executive, now president of Boanerges Solutions LLC: “My position has not changed any. I believe the Russians made a huge effort to alter the course of the election . . . The Russians are masters of blending truth and fiction and making something feel incredibly real when it’s not. Nothing I have seen really changes my opinion. I can’t tell you what part is real and what part is fake, but the thesis still stands for me, that it was a media influence hit job.”

Timothy D. Kilbourn, former dean of CIA’s Kent School of Intelligence Analysis: Didn’t respond.

Ron Marks, former CIA officer: Didn’t respond.

Jonna Hiestand Mendez, former CIA technical operations officer, now on board of the International Spy Museum: “I don’t have any comment. I would need a little more information.”

Emile Nakhleh, former director of CIA’s Political Islam Strategic Analysis Program, now at University of New Mexico: “I have not seen any information since then that would alter the decision behind signing the letter. That’s all I can go into. The whole issue was highly politicized and I don’t want to deal with that. I still stand by that letter.”

Gerald A. O’Shea, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.

Nick Shapiro, former CIA deputy chief of staff and senior adviser to the director: Didn’t respond.

John Sipher, former CIA senior operations officer: Declined to comment.

Stephen Slick, former National Security Council senior director for intelligence programs:
Didn’t respond.

Cynthia Strand, former CIA deputy assistant director for global issues: Didn’t respond.

Greg Tarbell, former CIA deputy executive director: Didn’t respond.

David Terry, former National Intelligence Collection Board chairman: Couldn’t be reached.

Greg Treverton, former National Intelligence Council chair, now senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies: “I’ll pass. I haven’t followed the case recently.”

Winston Wiley, former CIA director of analysis: Couldn’t be reached.

She backed up Sanders in 2016...

It's true too many democrats are horrible people. And it's even worse on the other side. Not enough americans are voting, it's all fucked up isnt it ?

tell me you're a FOX "news" viewer without saying you're a FOX "news" viewer, lol.