Quote (fender @ Sep 22 2022 07:21am)
where in the world is free speech in a better state then? i'm genuinely curious.
i mean you're right about this not changing anything in the short term, but this guy will not "fall" out of a window tomorrow, accidentally consume polonium, or disappear to some labour camp to be re-educated. he also won't be socially isolated by his peers.
doesn't mean it's perfect. people HAVE indeed been punished for criticising the monarchy, which is unacceptable imo - but that doesn't change the fact that speech is still the freest in what we call the "western world".
Who cares? I'm not saying 'free speech' is better elsewhere, I'm saying 'free speech' doesn't matter, it's only there because it's not dangerous and it makes people feel good through catharsis.
Quote (ferdia @ Sep 22 2022 07:42am)
I missed the article's about Charles being a pedophile, or owning his very own child rape island in the caribbean. its safer to throw such accusations at Prince Andrew. This is merely a cheap shot at an old handicapped man. to your comment: I mean in a family you can have a priest and a pedo, they dont have to be the same person (yes i accept the response "but are not all priests...". so in summary there is enough ammunition against Charles without having to making up false accusations.
IDC, he's the king of all pedophiles over there on Nonce Island, now. That's just how it is.