Quote (thesnipa @ 22 Aug 2022 21:55)
so if you posted on facebook "i take in stray animals because i dont want them to freeze in the winter", and then the local pound dropped off 50 cats into your yard without telling you then that would be totally cool?
What a silly analogy.
1. It's obvious that your average person neither has the space nor the resources to care for 50 cats, while cities like New York or Washington should have the size and strength to shoulder the same burden that they expect much smaller Texan border towns to shoulder.
2. Taking in stray animals is a largely non-political issue while immigration policy has huge political, social and economic ramifications. The concerted and public pushback against Trump's hawkish policies by the DNC, Democratic cities and Democrat-aligned media back in 2017-2018 was intended to undermine his immigration agenda, and it did. They knew full well what they were doing, they just expected the border states to take care of the fallout. Comparing mayors of the largest cities in the country holding a press conference and threatening to refuse to cooperate with ICE agents who have the "audacity" to enforce applicable law was almost unprecedented and cannot be compared to a random cat lady posting on facebook.
3. Democratic messaging on the issue, for example rallying cries like "refugees welcome", "no person is illegal" or "abolish ICE", signalled to the world that immigrants would be welcomed without upper limit and without regard for the legal status if/when Democrats are in charge. Therefore, their messaging has exacerbated the problem. By contrast, a virtue signalling facebook post will not have a measurable impact on the number of pets which are abandoned by their owners.