Judges, legislatures, etc.

It depends on the dis/misinformation, but it's usually fairly straightforward. There are few instances where it's legitimately difficult and I err on the side of allowing it in the open if there's any controversy.

everyone but the despots in power.

defeat "disinfo" with open dialog or be a crook and cancel it. canceling it only gives it credibility

that why people on the right never cancel people on the left. we want ev1 to see the kooky

This post was edited by TiStuff on Aug 9 2022 11:40pm

The right do not care about science or data, they just cherry pick whatever suits their preconceived notions.
That's why we need to protect the public from them.
Climate change is going to happen whether you believe in it or not.
Millions of dead Americans are not going to be any less dead if you keep covid denying, but many more may die if you get your way.
Sometimes you have to protect people from themselves.

The dumbest thing ive ever heard!!! Sorry...

There are lots of things that a person cant figure out by themselves. For example: are you a scientist with the necessary gear to check and confirm some facts about DNA? No, neither am I. We are at the end dependent on their knowledge.

and if your being lied to and the one telling the truth is cancelled?

Aha... convenient. A perfect play considering your government is pretty trash.

So all countries have worked together to create a false claims? I see, convenient

no actually it took a ton of money. why is austraila still in covidiot world? same with NZ. cheeet i live in kook califorina and we are pretty much done with it.

if they where legit they would come out in open discourse. thats how science is done.
"trust the science" cancel ev1 else isnt how science is done.

its going to come out one day and you will not be able to deny it. masks are chit and the jabs are shit.

find out who are the WEF and who they own

very convenient buddy... As long as you are happy

when was it decided that it was the kook australian government was the authority on science?
when was it decided that it was the kook NZ government was the authority on science?
when was it decided that it was the kook democrat party government was the authority on science?
when was it decided that it was kook google the authority on science?
when was it decided that it was kook face book the authority on science?
when was it decided that it was kook youtube the authority on science?
when was it decided that it was kook zuckerberg the authority on science?
when was it decided that it was kook susan wojcikie the authority on science?
when was it decided that it was kook jack dorsey the authority on science?