I even underlined it in RED. Try reading... THEN type.

The problem the USA is facing is illiteracy

Literally nothing you underlined has anything to do with judicial review. Try reading, then type. This isn't a controversial opinion I'm expressing to you, I'm telling you the reality of constitutional law that has been set in stone since 1803. You're misreading the constitution if you think that's describing judicial review.

So in a rather crude and uncouth manner , my apologies, if they are having their period, all common sense will be off and whoever that is appointed, be it left or right leaning will set shit on fire yo.

he's right. previous to 1803 (well after the drafting of the constitution) the scotus existed, but judicial review did not.

the constitution as drafted left the actual role of the SCOTUS unclear, even the federalist papers only make it clear that it was meant to be a check on federal power, but not how.

The idea that what's written in the constitution has no weight in judicial review is wrong.

Edit- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_review_in_the_United_States

This post was edited by Mondain on Jul 26 2022 12:51pm

you're misreading, while calling others illiterate.

the process by which congress/senate/president draft, debate, vote on, and pass laws is clearly drafted.

the process by which the SCOTUS themselves are nominated and appointed is clearly drafted.

how the SCOTUS operated wasn't clearly drafted. of course the wording of the constitution was considered by Marshall, but his ruling in the case was his opinion, and it became the precedent by which judicial review was justified and never ended.

So you've read the US consitution and bill of rights? Without lieing.

e- And yes I am literally calling people illiterate. Too many base their life on emotion rather than truth.

This post was edited by Mondain on Jul 26 2022 12:53pm

yes. i have credits from law school on constitutional law. ghot has a certificate in fantasy map making.