d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Wait,.. The Ukraine Bio-lab's Weren't A Conspiracy
Prev1234517Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 15,977
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 102,354.50
Mar 11 2022 04:52am
Quote (Santara @ Mar 11 2022 11:42am)
NATO made no "promise," nor was it party to the 2 plus 4 treaty, nor did the 2 plus 4 treaty ban the expansion of NATO. There, you missed it the first time apparently. It's is now debunked.

The whole world can blame them, because they've invaded their neighbor so that they can expand their empire.

wE bEtTeR nOt Go To WaR wItH a CoUnTrY wItH 6k NuKeS - dude, the US has enough nuclear weapons to destroy the entire world all by ourselves. That the Russians have even more is not "extra impressive."


I've posted several sources already that prove promises were made. Not on paper but a promise is a promise.

You've proven to be quite the clown and incapable of realizing what a nuclear war would mean.

Here's another source, real, unbiased, from Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs.

Member
Posts: 52,225
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Mar 11 2022 04:58am
Quote (Djunior @ Mar 11 2022 04:52am)
I've posted several sources already that prove promises were made. Not on paper but a promise is a promise.

You've proven to be quite the clown and incapable of realizing what a nuclear war would mean.

Here's another source, real, unbiased, from Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-alxZvUCS8


"Promises" were not made BY NATO. Maybe you don't understand that in democratically elected countries, the policy positions of the governments change from one administration to the next, and that if you want to have a policy stay in effect, you get a treaty to enforce it? Do you think that if Donald Trump "promises" something to another country, and then he loses an election, and the next administration comes in and reserves course on Trump's policy, because you didn't get the promise in writing in a treaty, that you can complain that the USA "broke its promises?" FOH clown.

This post was edited by Santara on Mar 11 2022 04:58am
Member
Posts: 52,225
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Mar 11 2022 05:32am
Just to reiterate how badly you got 360 no-scoped: any promises made to the Soviet Union were made by the Bush administration. And during the Bush administration, those promises were kept. In 1993 however, the Clinton administration was ushered in, and because there was no treaty, they were not bound by any "promises" made by the Bush administration, because the Bush administration was no longer the legal representative of the United States. So claiming that "promises were made" is just you and your fellow Russian trolls slinging shit at the wall in the hopes of seeing what sticks.
Member
Posts: 33,925
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Mar 11 2022 05:58am
Quote (Mondain @ Mar 10 2022 08:04pm)
I thought this was a conspiracy nut theory to explain Russia's targeted bombing of said labs.

Anyone care to share info on this?


From what I understand. Ukraine does have US biolabs, however Putin hasn’t explicitly targeted them.

From what I understand, anything funded by the DOD this way is automatically classified as secret, so it is impossible to know exactly what they do.

This post was edited by EndlessSky on Mar 11 2022 05:58am
Member
Posts: 50,841
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,846.00
Mar 11 2022 07:33am
Quote (Santara @ Mar 11 2022 04:22am)
When in doubt, continue to peddle debunked points about "promises."^^^
Russia's invasion of Ukraine is NOT justified.


What's the measure of justification? Moral righteousness in the eyes of the almighty? A nebulous and undefinable sense of right and wrong? The arbitrarily decided international law, writ by whoever wins?
Russia has motives and self-interest, and those are its justification to invade, whether we agree with them or not. Putin has been opposing NATO expansion his entire life and NATO has been creeping up to Russia's doorstep, and the further the west encroached the more untenable the Russian borders became. We had Kissinger calling it out a decade ago that the more Putin was backed into the corner, he'd have to respond. And somehow Kissinger is still around despite writing that at age 90. But to Russia it doesn't matter if there were 'broken promises' or not, or who sinned first. Geopolitics aren't decided by Santa clause weighing whos been naughty and nice, who blames who, who was right or wrong. Its who can and who can't. And Russia will act while it still can act, and did.
Member
Posts: 23,970
Joined: Feb 28 2007
Gold: 35,554.14
Warn: 10%
Mar 11 2022 07:37am
Quote (Goomshill @ Mar 11 2022 07:33am)
What's the measure of justification? Moral righteousness in the eyes of the almighty? A nebulous and undefinable sense of right and wrong? The arbitrarily decided international law, writ by whoever wins?
Russia has motives and self-interest, and those are its justification to invade, whether we agree with them or not. Putin has been opposing NATO expansion his entire life and NATO has been creeping up to Russia's doorstep, and the further the west encroached the more untenable the Russian borders became. We had Kissinger calling it out a decade ago that the more Putin was backed into the corner, he'd have to respond. And somehow Kissinger is still around despite writing that at age 90. But to Russia it doesn't matter if there were 'broken promises' or not, or who sinned first. Geopolitics aren't decided by Santa clause weighing whos been naughty and nice, who blames who, who was right or wrong. Its who can and who can't. And Russia will act while it still can act, and did.


I think maybe we are on the same side, but don't really know.
Cause I never read your wall of text posts.
Maybe you could work on being more concise?

Not an attack, just an opinion.
Do as you will.

This post was edited by sirthom on Mar 11 2022 07:37am
Member
Posts: 50,841
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,846.00
Mar 11 2022 07:39am
Quote (sirthom @ Mar 11 2022 07:37am)
I think maybe we are on the same side, but don't really know.
Cause I never read your wall of text posts.
Maybe you could work on being more concise?

Not an attack, just an opinion.
Do as you will.


to be concise: I rarely have a side
Member
Posts: 52,225
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Mar 11 2022 07:42am
Quote (Goomshill @ Mar 11 2022 07:33am)
What's the measure of justification? Moral righteousness in the eyes of the almighty? A nebulous and undefinable sense of right and wrong? The arbitrarily decided international law, writ by whoever wins?
Russia has motives and self-interest, and those are its justification to invade, whether we agree with them or not. Putin has been opposing NATO expansion his entire life and NATO has been creeping up to Russia's doorstep, and the further the west encroached the more untenable the Russian borders became. We had Kissinger calling it out a decade ago that the more Putin was backed into the corner, he'd have to respond. And somehow Kissinger is still around despite writing that at age 90. But to Russia it doesn't matter if there were 'broken promises' or not, or who sinned first. Geopolitics aren't decided by Santa clause weighing whos been naughty and nice, who blames who, who was right or wrong. Its who can and who can't. And Russia will act while it still can act, and did.


There's a difference between "reason" as in " to give an excuse," and "reason" as in "the capacity of consciously applying logic by drawing conclusions from new or existing information, with the aim of seeking the truth."

Russia is engaged in the former, I am engaged in the latter. The truth of the matter is that Putin is seeking to reincorporate the Soviet Empire, but the EXCUSES he's giving are contrived.
Member
Posts: 15,977
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 102,354.50
Mar 11 2022 07:51am
Quote (Santara @ Mar 11 2022 11:58am)
"Promises" were not made BY NATO. Maybe you don't understand that in democratically elected countries, the policy positions of the governments change from one administration to the next, and that if you want to have a policy stay in effect, you get a treaty to enforce it? Do you think that if Donald Trump "promises" something to another country, and then he loses an election, and the next administration comes in and reserves course on Trump's policy, because you didn't get the promise in writing in a treaty, that you can complain that the USA "broke its promises?" FOH clown.


Quote (Santara @ Mar 11 2022 12:32pm)
Just to reiterate how badly you got 360 no-scoped: any promises made to the Soviet Union were made by the Bush administration. And during the Bush administration, those promises were kept. In 1993 however, the Clinton administration was ushered in, and because there was no treaty, they were not bound by any "promises" made by the Bush administration, because the Bush administration was no longer the legal representative of the United States. So claiming that "promises were made" is just you and your fellow Russian trolls slinging shit at the wall in the hopes of seeing what sticks.


And you think I didn't know that it was Clinton that spat on the promises that were made? He looked at Russia, saw that they were down and kicked them. Like expected from a democrat POS.

Clowns like you don't get it. This aint Afghanistan you can bomb into submission, Russia will give you some of your own medicine and just in case those 6K nukes might come in handy you dumb dumb.

Why don't you fuck off to Ukraine and join that foreign legion, go have that war that you're after and don't bring it here FFS. Nobody cares about stupid morons dying there. Ask Bryce Mitchell ;)
Member
Posts: 52,225
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Mar 11 2022 08:04am
Quote (Djunior @ Mar 11 2022 07:51am)
And you think I didn't know that it was Clinton that spat on the promises that were made? He looked at Russia, saw that they were down and kicked them. Like expected from a democrat POS.

Clowns like you don't get it. This aint Afghanistan you can bomb into submission, Russia will give you some of your own medicine and just in case those 6K nukes might come in handy you dumb dumb.

Why don't you fuck off to Ukraine and join that foreign legion, go have that war that you're after and don't bring it here FFS. Nobody cares about stupid morons dying there. Ask Bryce Mitchell ;)


You forgot to say "our own medicine," Ivan.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1234517Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll