Quote (Cascadian @ Feb 28 2022 09:57pm)
Selection bias, with small sample sizes; results inconclusive. Additionally, you are accepting the absence of conservative women sharing their stories of sexual abuse with you, as data that they were not abused. Your conclusion is flawed.
"Selection bias, small sample sizes,"
lol pre-warning on original post asking for experiences, not data charts.
Read the original post. Be smarter, ok?
I want to know what people who have had sex more than 2 times think.
So when I ask you to infer on your experiences and opinions, i didn't ask you to pull somebody else's data. Try to contribute buddy. If you can.
Way off topic, just to educate you, I'm speaking down to you, because you haven't proved you are educated(or fuckable) sorry:
People have the option to take information in 2 forms:
1 from other people.
or
2 from their experiences.
I can tell by your response you lacked experienced with women.
I can also tell those that quickly cite other people's data, shows they typically don't create data, therefore cant contribute any data.
It also takes a lot of integrity to secure and know how to keep data accurate. That's not your thing.
Forget the fact that you can't read the original post, and can't even contribute your stories about chicks on either side.
How about this... how do you not know that anecdotes lead to trends? That's how HYPOTHESIS are created. Then tested. To find the truth, instead of you know, ignorance.
So you always start with small samples.
That creates the inference to pose the hypothesis.
Hypothesis on anomalies or patterns is the foundation of SCIENCE. Which is the religion of the liberal.
As a liberal, please take 3 Hail Sciences, and you will be forgiven of your sins.