It is a step towards normalization. Anyone without rose colored blinders can see this.

Pedophiles did infact go watch this netflix softcore child porn movie - and then immediately went on to twitter dot com & produced glowing reviews with their blue checkmark accounts, thus seeking to normalize it. Normalization is the problem here of which you seem to be oblivious of, not the universally known fact that there are bad things on the internet.

Argument of coverage being "overblown" can only be accepted if you find the revealing cruelty to acknowledge that Netflix were perfectly within boundaries - when they replaced the original, in comparison harmless movie poster, WITH ONE WHERE UNDERAGE ACTORS ARE PORTRAYED AS STRIPPERS.

this was greenlit by left-wing Netflix, this was approved at the highest echelon of left-wing Netflix, this is what normalization of child sexual exploitation looks like - done by the usual suspects

(((the usual suspects)))

i like that i said massive platfom youtube should remove children in skimpy clothing from their platform entirely, and that i said the film itself was unnecessary, and you two take away "he doesnt even know what normalization is".

bravo guys.

as well as "coverage cant be overblown unless you 100% accept netflix was acting legitimately". lol, idk wtf to even do with that trash argument tbh.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Oct 28 2021 08:02am

the reporting on it was overblown.

im glad we agree. i am in no way oblivious to child exploitation nor the normalization of child to teenage promiscuity due to the ever creeping sexualization in media. Nicki Minaj should be ashamed of herself.

for starters, instead of being defensive, you can more clearly characterize your vague "overblown coverage" trash argument

overblown how exactly?

Movie is "lawfully defined as pedophilia". Not by me, not by websites you are triggered by, but by IMDB.

https://web.archive.org/web/20200910143246if_/https://m.imdb.com/title/tt9196192/parentalguide/nudity

I'd say at this point people hard against the film have probably looked at more images from the movie than any pedo.

Helical keeps images of it on his comp ready to go. Pretty fucked up if you ask me.

This post was edited by SBD on Oct 28 2021 08:15am

lol you are a nutter now, what happened ?

Coverage at the time and reactions on social media of opponents of the film and netflix implied that it was going to be something pedofiles would flock to masturbate to. and generally put up a fuss so loud that it led to a Streisand effect on the film, driving more attention to it that it otherwise would have garnered.

its because of brigading of content like this that the dislike functions and rating functions on netflix were disabled, ala the pile on for Amy Schumer's legitimately unfunny stand up special. if people were able to control this behavior and simply react reasonably perhaps we'd have that function still and Cuties could have been 1 star'd down to nonexistence where it belongs.

but overall im not going to litigate something with any modicum of research just because its the thing you misremembered about me. u called me a pedo, im not one, and im not in favor of child sexualizing normalization. you're the one defensively insulting me and reaching to make a point that's a strawman, rather than just saying "oh i remembered wrong then". maybe toss in a "have a good day".

also not sure what non-lawyer idiot wrote the line "this is lawfully defined as pedophilia". pedophilia is a mental disorder, that is psychologically defined. Child pornography is a class of imagery, lawfully defined as a crime in certain contexts, by the law.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Oct 28 2021 08:23am