d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Interesting Take On Communist Manifesto
Prev123
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 61,688
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 28.77
Apr 24 2021 10:23pm
Wow he didn’t even read it.
Member
Posts: 61,688
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 28.77
Apr 24 2021 10:25pm
Quote (addone @ Apr 24 2021 05:53pm)
He is talking about a paradox between communist controlled China who is employing Capitalism through selected few


Aka capitalism.

Quote (addone @ Apr 24 2021 02:08pm)
Zizek didn't destroy anything lol. He makes a few interesting points of view but ultimately agrees that communism has failed


This is like agreeing that Star Trek space technocracy has failed.
Member
Posts: 78,723
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 493.00
Apr 26 2021 07:42pm
Sounds like a manifesto for the jealous and envious. Quick google search confirms marx was a lazy bum and an all round terrible person who shirked parental duties for his illegitimate son. The balls it takes to write this garbage while being a deadbeat.

A house may be large or small; as long as the neighboring houses are likewise small, it satisfies all social requirement for a residence. But let there arise next to the little house a palace, and the little house shrinks to a hut. The little house now makes it clear that its inmate has no social position at all to maintain, or but a very insignificant one; and however high it may shoot up in the course of civilization, if the neighboring palace rises in equal or even in greater measure, the occupant of the relatively little house will always find himself more uncomfortable, more dissatisfied, more cramped within his four walls.

An appreciable rise in wages presupposes a rapid growth of productive capital. Rapid growth of productive capital calls forth just as rapid a growth of wealth, of luxury, of social needs and social pleasures. Therefore, although the pleasures of the labourer have increased, the social gratification which they afford has fallen in comparison with the increased pleasures of the capitalist, which are inaccessible to the worker, in comparison with the stage of development of society in general. Our wants and pleasures have their origin in society; we therefore measure them in relation to society; we do not measure them in relation to the objects which serve for their gratification. Since they are of a social nature, they are of a relative nature.

This post was edited by duffman316 on Apr 26 2021 07:48pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev123
Add Reply New Topic New Poll