Quote (EndlessSky @ 9 Feb 2021 17:24)
Ingraham is pretty honest about her bias
Which part of the article is a false assessment on its face? One subject to discuss would make this easier
Sure lets go through it
1. She talks about the Democrats and the media that serves them (according to you Fox would be one of those, so she is talking about herself in your words) are trying to get high with their obsession with Donald Trump. Incorrect. She generalizes dems like a 4 year old generalizes horses.
2. Her entire rant has an undertone meant to scare the plebs. Rather pathetic tactic. Trying to scare one means that Fox is assuming their audience are just straight plebian scrubs, we know that isn't true, but they constantly attack the lowest common denominator. Shamelessly scaring plebs that cant think for themselves is their number 1 tactic. Very poor.
3. She mentions about how dems want to de moralize conservatives that voted for Trump with the impeachment proceedings. That is incorrect. He is being impeached because he is a dumb shit president and told a bunch of morons to storm the capitol then went on to urge those same people to murder Pence.
4. She mentions how dems want the viewer to believe that things will never get better. Listent o any of Bidens speeches about moving forward and things getting better. THINGS ARE ALREADY BETTER THAN UNDER TRUMP. Vaccines are being distributed, Presidential approval rating is the highest EVER. thats AP numbers not random off brand repub propaganda website.
5. She says if you are a democrat voter then the democractic party wants you obsessed with hatred for Trump. This isnt True. Dems want the horrible cancer that was the presiding president to be removed because that president was literally trying to rig an election and subvert democracy. ANY president that ahs done that in the past got the same retribution. It has nothing to do with Trump himself. That is such a psychotic way to look at things anyway and she is feeding that bullshit to the plebs.
6. She says that dems are trying to get democrat voters to punish anyone that ever supported Trump. This is simply not true. I know Trump voters, I would consider myself a liberal, I do not want to punish people for having liked him, she is again generalizing over 80 million people in such a sycophantic way there is so much ambiguity to her statement and it is simply not true. She ensures to use ambiguity to widen the catch all net for the plebs to fall into.
7. She says that 'if you really keep an eye on whats going on you will realize Biden isnt doing anything.' Common tactic that retards use to control the pleb viewers, She doesnt present evidence or anything just says a controversial statement and pauses for the audience to be like 'oh wow im smart so i must also realize this hurrr durrrr'
8. She calls his team snotty entitled goofballs. Throwing out insults I guess is a good way to meet with your pleb idiot voters who respond to insults rather than facts. I guess this is just a good move on her part understanding her fans will throw tyheir shirts around if she starts insulting people.
Thats just the first minute
Then she spend the next 6 minutes with random stories adding in samples of Republican buzz words like immigrants, terrorist, statue, cancel-culture, debt, free speech so that the plebian ears perk up every so often and the viewer can think ' oh i know that buzz word ya fuck the debt' ITs just so bad man you really gotta be pretty dumb man like really how fuckin stupid do you have to be man. She talks about russia collusion like bro ROBERT MUELLER RELEASED THIS THING CALLED A REPORT THAT SHOWS ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO CHARGE THE PRESIDENT WITH COLLUSION. ANYBODY CAN JUST GOOGLE IT AND READ IT BRO. why she saying collusion is fake??? Its literally proven bro read a fukn book bro