Quote (Black XistenZ @ Aug 29 2020 09:01pm)
Fair enough. Fatal shootings by the police or surely the least underreported category.
I think where your numbers are vulnerable is when you jump from 250 black victims of fatal police shootings to just 7 who were unarmed. That drop seems too steep to me. Also, what exactly does "unarmed" mean in this context? For example, a guy wielding a Swiss Army Knife qualifies him as "armed", but it doesnt justify a fatal shot under most circumstances.
I took the washington posts's stats, which doesn't specify what they mean by 'unarmed' in their methodology:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2019/national/police-shootings-2019/they list 14 cases of 'unarmed' black people shot by police in 2019
so I simply googled up each of those cases and counted how many were actually unarmed and how many resulted in police facing charges
and I removed the ones where the guy was driving a car into police (a vehicle is a deadly weapon), two where they actually had a gun and it was falsely listed (atatiana jefferson had a gun, gregory griffin was in a vehicle with a passenger pointing his gun at police and struck by returning fire) and one where a guy told police he had a gun and threatened them despite not actually having one, and the guys who stole tasers
I don't know whether I should include the christopher whitfield shooting, where the black guy struck the cop's gun during a struggle and caused it to go off and shoot himself, since the cop didn't actually shoot him, it was an accident caused by the perp.
you could go through those 14 and tally them up again, but the WaPo numbers are clearly wrong.