Seems your go-to when you want to dismiss an opinion is to start attaching labels you dont like to the other person regardless of their accuracy.

You've already stated you support child mutilation. I'd rather say you've labeled yourself here.

Where did I say that? Be specific

i support circumcision because all cheese should be pasteurized before human consumption. i also do not support this type of law, because it infringes on the rights of parents. but think that a large hurdle should be required to clear before any reassignment surgeries are done. and i dont mean going to a trans specialist for a single opinion. im not even very in favor of hormonal treatment, but have read recently that most of it can be reversed. its a tough line to walk, but if something is reversible i dont see the moral issue with doing it within reason to children at or near teen ages. we are just not equipped with many long term studies being that the practice and number of reversed cases arent that high.

He's playing like he's a libertarian.

It's not that I don't agree with this ban, but it's not a significant issue. It's really easy for an incompetent, populist government to ban things and look tough, but I care about issues that will affect people's lives.

How are the free trade deal negotiations going with the world? They're non-existent. How many people have died from coronavirus? 35k officially and 65k unofficially using FT excess deaths, with a population of 65m.

This post was edited by dro94 on May 20 2020 11:27am

The bill is to prevent irreversible surgeries that mutilate their children prior to their children turning 18.

The part you don't seem to understand is that the "transitional surgeries" remove these children from the gene pool entirely. They can no longer have children of their own, they've now been castrated.

It's a rather extreme and completely irreversible choice. The bill doesn't even prevent hormone therapy, or anything else. Merely removes the ability of parents to push their kids into something that may well ruin their lives.

By claiming parents "know what's best" when it comes to quite literally mutilating their children, you're showing yourself to be an active supporter of child mutilation.

Also, this wouldn't be "big government in Washington". This is a UK bill. The UK is not govered by Washington, genius.



The UK bill would only prevent the irreversible surgeries. You can't reverse castration.

And the Circumcision argument is invalid. Bathing is not considered taboo. If parents can't teach their sons how to wash under their foreskin, then they aren't qualified to be parents.

it makes me a bad parent to want my son to get 2x more blowjobs? i was expecting a #1 Dad mug 16 years from now not a call to CPS.

Supporting the freedom to do something isn't the same as condoning people do it.

I don't support you being able to post on this forum but I believe in your freedom to do so.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on May 20 2020 11:57am

i freely dont support breast support, i'd support no support, pure freedom.