d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Senate Impeachment Trial 2020
Prev12345134Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 27,157
Joined: Mar 11 2016
Gold: 9.77
Warn: 10%
Jan 18 2020 08:53pm
Oh Man

Remember all these idiots last month that were saying 'there is no proof'

so funny.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jan 18 2020 08:57pm
Quote (Phaggot @ Jan 18 2020 08:53pm)
Oh Man

Remember all these idiots last month that were saying 'there is no proof'

so funny.


That can't happen
It can happen but there's no proof it's happening
There's proof it's happening, but it isn't a problem
It's a problem but shouldn't do anything about it <---- We are here
Okay we should do something about it, but there's nothing we can do
Something can be done but we can't get the political will to do it anyway
Oh, the problem got solved? GIVE ME CREDIT!
Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Jan 18 2020 09:09pm
Demoshits still have no proof. Cry in failure, in the dustbin of history.
Member
Posts: 54,185
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Jan 18 2020 09:53pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ 19 Jan 2020 03:57)
That can't happen
It can happen but there's no proof it's happening
There's proof it's happening, but it isn't a problem
It's a problem but shouldn't do anything about it <---- We are here
Okay we should do something about it, but there's nothing we can do
Something can be done but we can't get the political will to do it anyway
Oh, the problem got solved? GIVE ME CREDIT!


"we should do something about it, but the constitution only offers a binary choice between two inadequate reactions: a meaningless censure, or a super-drastic removal from office via impeachment." <- we are here
Member
Posts: 6,517
Joined: Oct 22 2005
Gold: 12.79
Jan 18 2020 10:03pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jan 18 2020 10:53pm)
"we should do something about it, but the constitution only offers a binary choice between two inadequate reactions: a meaningless censure, or a super-drastic removal from office via impeachment." <- we are here


We decided we are going to throw real crooks with actual evidence against them like Avenetti and Omar in jail instead <--- we are here.

This post was edited by LA-Leviathan on Jan 18 2020 10:04pm
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jan 18 2020 10:36pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jan 18 2020 09:53pm)
"we should do something about it, but the constitution only offers a binary choice between two inadequate reactions: a meaningless censure, or a super-drastic removal from office via impeachment." <- we are here


Give it a few weeks/months. You'll move right along to the next step.
Member
Posts: 26,025
Joined: Jun 14 2006
Gold: 5,300.00
Warn: 10%
Jan 18 2020 11:42pm
if you're curious about the "bombshell" evidence that came out, Ben goes through the provision of law pretty well in this video below.
he does a follow up video that covers Parnas more, but meh.
Member
Posts: 16,020
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 102,354.50
Jan 18 2020 11:54pm
Quote (tagged4nothing @ Jan 19 2020 12:42pm)
if you're curious about the "bombshell" evidence that came out, Ben goes through the provision of law pretty well in this video below.
he does a follow up video that covers Parnas more, but meh.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9Mr12l8I40


"Donald Trump has been impeached for ever"

Next they will go after the nazi collaborators (Trump administration) and those red hat wearing fascists on the streets whom voted for this orange monster
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jan 19 2020 12:02am
Quote (tagged4nothing @ Jan 18 2020 11:42pm)
if you're curious about the "bombshell" evidence that came out, Ben goes through the provision of law pretty well in this video below.
he does a follow up video that covers Parnas more, but meh.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9Mr12l8I40


Ive seen enough dishonest BS from Shapiro to know never to trust his analysis. Hes not interested in truth, hes interested in "winning the debate against the libs" and making you feel smart for already believing what you want to believe. Hes basically just Crowder with a more "I'm a smart intellectual" coat of paint.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Jan 19 2020 12:02am
Member
Posts: 6,517
Joined: Oct 22 2005
Gold: 12.79
Jan 19 2020 12:47am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Jan 19 2020 01:02am)
Ive seen enough dishonest BS from Shapiro to know never to trust his analysis. Hes not interested in truth, hes interested in "winning the debate against the libs" and making you feel smart for already believing what you want to believe. Hes basically just Crowder with a more "I'm a smart intellectual" coat of paint.


:rofl:
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev12345134Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll