Boomer as fuck

- Pissing on climate change issue - because he has no children and know he will die before it starts to get a vital problem -
- Congratulating China for its uighurs concentration camps because he simply hate humanity.

"STFU boomer" meme is still fair.




This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Dec 14 2019 01:18pm

I wouldn't wipe my ass with this paper. It makes very broad claims about the literature as a whole but only has six citations and the citations virtually never follow the broad claims, it has numerous grammatical errors, and a basic factual misunderstanding of the material it's attempting to discuss.

And finally, it isn't a published paper. It's a non peer reviewed manuscript that was uploaded to a website.

"The basic task is to divide the observed global temperature anomaly into two
parts: the natural component and the part due to the green house gases."

This is garbage because the natural component is partially due to greenhouse gasses. They also don't define what the "natural component" includes.

" The red and blue envelopes are computed using
climate models."

Just "climate models"? Doesn't list a specific set of climate models used and is therefore not reproducible and bullshit.

"However, there are
a lot of papers, where sensitivities lower than one degree are estimated without
using GCM."

So cite the papers, or cite a review that cites the papers. Just saying "a lot of papers" and leaving it at that isn't evidence.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Dec 14 2019 02:24pm

Also, dudes who wrote it don't really have any published history.

Is it not this person?

https://biography.omicsonline.org/finland/university-of-turku/jyrki-kauppinen-381185

Yeah. Must have mistyped his name, my search didn't deliver much. Also the other guy does have very little mention.

Wow! That "sounds" pretty good, and I'm sure will impress a few PaRDians. However, grammatical errors are common these days, due to the various nationalities of those doing the research.

Secondly, since you're NOT a climate expert, I think I'll just wipe MY ass with your comment.

I mean, I don't hold this paper against him. I don't know who uploaded this paper, but it is clearly not finished and hasn't been submitted for serious consideration. I wouldn't be surprised if one of his graduate students or undergraduate students submitted it against his advisement.