Excellent topic title. Had to read the whole article before I made the connection. But excellent, none the less.




/e Kudos

This post was edited by Ghot on Dec 11 2019 03:09pm

okay Boomer,

>doesn't understand the practicality, and importance of identification to assert rights
>thinks asking to confirm and confirming identity is taking away rights
>thinks a picture on a piece of plastic should be all we need for identification as a barrier to selling someone a piece of equipment meant to kill people

hurry up and die

thanks.

Don't be silly. Property ownership is a right, and the notion that me owning property takes rights from you is asinine.

My parents are boomers, rand.

I understand just fine that peasants and supplicants such as yourself might find it easier to lick the palms of your government masters to make asking for your rights easier. I also understand that one doesn't ask permission to engage in their rights.
When the condition added to your right is that you failing to jump through their hoops means that you can't exercise your right, it is de facto no longer a right and has been taken from you.
You're the moron who thinks having the addresses match is critical in identifying the person on the card, not me.

Please, don't vote.

LOL @ you thinking Santara is a boomer.

Incorrect.

A person that has these rights must identify themselves. children argue semantics, building the strawman, It isnt' about an address, or a picture, it is about the existing processes in which we as Humans identify each other.

A person has to identify themselves as that person, or else then every single person on the planet would be able to go into an american gun store and willy nilly buy guns to be used for things other than hunting ducks.

If only Americans have the right, then how can someone discern that the patron is an American???!?!?!? IDENTIFICATION.

I am a moron, yet you cannot grasp the excruciatingly simple concept of why I need to show that I am an American to buy a gun. :thinking:



well if he isnt that is even worse. fuck.

This post was edited by Phaggot on Dec 11 2019 03:28pm

Yet here you are arguing the straw man about the gun, when the topic is specifically about ammunition (when one is buying ammunition, it is a pretty safe assumption that one already owns the gun to use it).

Absent of property all parties have a right to use any resource. Once you claim something as your property I lose that right. Therefore your having property infringes on my right to use an object I would otherwise have a right to.

The rights of one infringe on the rights of others. Its most obvious in the case where a king owns all the land, but the issues don't totally go away on distribution.

You snooze, you lose.

Guns and ammo are the same as far as I'm concerned. You can't use one without the other. As someone who lives in CA, it's a fucking mess that all your data is spread across various state agencies (DMV, voter registration, etc.) I'm probably not in compliance with ALL my stuff to be perfectly honest.