Quote (Goomshill @ Dec 5 2019 09:45am)
how are you defining 'stand your ground laws'?
normally the only distinction that stand your ground makes is that in the absence of such laws, its left up to the discretion of prosecutors / juries / judges as to whether self-defense is justifiable. But in duty to retreat laws, you can't argue self-defense if you had an opportunity to retreat from a situation you could predict would turn violent. A duty to retreat law in effect says that the very action of remaining in a dangerous situation makes you either guilty or dead, kill or be killed.
there should be more stringent application of escalation of force calculations. if they have a knife or are a 300 lb monster and you're a 100 lb shrimp, sure your life is in danger. but we've seen repeatedly, whether its cops or citizens, "i feared for my life" becomes a subjective and unknowable get out of trouble free card. perhaps stand your ground should be used more as a way to reduce charges, perhaps even to a low no-jail-time offense. their use to absolve all guilt feels like an overstep when we look at the applications. especially in policing.
overall stand your ground laws are so selectively applied that its not a big ticket item for me. its just that when i look at the recent applications none of them give me the feeling of justice.
on the topic of cops specifically ive been saying for a long time de-escalation training in the form of Brazilian jujitsu or something is needed big time. eliminate all of the "3 cops surround and eventually shoot dead unarmed mentally ill homeless person" stories and the cops reputation would improve over time. those typifying events have lasting negative impact. and physical fitness generally should be a hard requirement for all police, fat cops are a fucking joke.
This post was edited by thesnipa on Dec 5 2019 09:51am