d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Hillary's Emails
Prev12345Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 1341Replies: 47Track Topic
Member
Posts: 33,927
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
#21
Aug 28 2018 12:21pm
Quote (fender @ Aug 28 2018 11:40am)
you know you're desperate if your whataboutism essays revolve around a daily caller article...
hacks gonna hack...


Genetic fallacy/10

How are those migrant rape gangs working out?
Member
Posts: 50,901
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,836.00
#22
Aug 28 2018 12:31pm
Quote (ThatAlex @ Aug 28 2018 12:13pm)
The Office of Inspector General for the State Department reported that Clinton was repeatedly told not use a private email server due to national security risks, and she still did.

I have no idea why she was not indicted. The distinction Comey made between gross negligence and 'extreme carelessness' was already pretty vague, and then he delivered this gem:

"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now."


If we have our priorities straight, we should be going after the Chinese and Russias, not Hillary, Manafort, Cohen, etc.
Member
Posts: 105,146
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
#23
Aug 28 2018 12:37pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Aug 28 2018 02:31pm)
If we have our priorities straight, we should be going after the Chinese and Russias, not Hillary, Manafort, Cohen, etc.




Close. We should be going after Hillary, Russia and China.
Member
Posts: 12,379
Joined: Jul 14 2008
Gold: 2,620.00
#24
Aug 28 2018 12:43pm
Quote (Goomshill @ 28 Aug 2018 13:31)
If we have our priorities straight, we should be going after the Chinese and Russias, not Hillary, Manafort, Cohen, etc.




Do you think Trump should uphold this pledge to appoint a special prosecutor to look into Hillary Clinton's private server use/email scandal?
Member
Posts: 61,688
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 28.77
#25
Aug 28 2018 01:21pm
Quote (ThatAlex @ Aug 28 2018 11:13am)
The Office of Inspector General for the State Department reported that Clinton was repeatedly told not use a private email server due to national security risks, and she still did.

I have no idea why she was not indicted. The distinction Comey made between gross negligence and 'extreme carelessness' was already pretty vague, and then he delivered this gem:

"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now."


You don't understand that quote at all, do you?
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
#26
Aug 28 2018 01:38pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ 28 Aug 2018 19:21)
Genetic fallacy/10


apparently the irony of that coming from a member of the 'fake news' crowd is completely lost on you, but i almost spilt my tea reading that. good one...
Member
Posts: 49,894
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
#27
Aug 28 2018 02:35pm
Not sure how your intelligence agencies are supposed to be unbiased.
The ridiculous system over there means whatever party is in power is in charge of all of them.
How do you investigate Hillary if she can fire you with near zero repercussions?
Likewise for trump.
Mueller is walking on eggshells right now knowing he could be fired at any time.
Member
Posts: 33,927
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
#28
Aug 28 2018 03:22pm
Quote (fender @ Aug 28 2018 03:38pm)
apparently the irony of that coming from a member of the 'fake news' crowd is completely lost on you, but i almost spilt my tea reading that. good one...


False equivalency fallacy/10

This is going to keep going in circles until you actually present some data with analysis
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
#29
Aug 28 2018 03:25pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ 28 Aug 2018 22:22)
False equivalency fallacy/10

This is going to keep going in circles until you actually present some data with analysis


https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-caller/
Member
Posts: 12,379
Joined: Jul 14 2008
Gold: 2,620.00
#30
Aug 28 2018 05:12pm
Quote (inkanddagger @ 28 Aug 2018 14:21)
You don't understand that quote at all, do you?


How do you interpret that statement?

I interpret it as: Under similar circumstances, we would consider administrative or security sanctions for a person who committed similar wrongdoing, but we will not do that in this case.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev12345Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact