Being a scientist means testing, time to go test the theories you came up with. Come back when you have repeatable results.

Better yet, he should come back when his results are repeatable by others.

I think it would be better if others could repeat his work first.

I think that if Albert Einstein had proposed his theories today, he would have been asked to build a nuclear reactor to prove that his theories are accurate.

And you would be wrong, because the crux of his theory was proven when light was observed bending around the sun during an eclipse.

Albert Einstein's theories did not prevent the outbreak of World War II. I want to first create complete theories before trying to prove them.

You wouldn't expect his theories to prevent World War II. It's pretty silly to think any scientific theory could have done that.

No theory is ever "complete", we can only ever achieve approximations, but with every new theory that is tested and validated we reach an increasingly more accurate approximation of reality.

I think, like Winston Churchill, that there is a lack of social intelligence in society.
And I think that a good social intelligence could have prevented World War II, yes.



This post was edited by Chevaucheur on Jun 11 2018 04:43am

So then, how do you measure social intelligence, what would a high social intelligence measurement look like, and what would a low measurement look like?

Do you really think that the murder of 6,000,000 Jews was inevitable?