Quote (card_sultan @ Sep 13 2014 12:28am)
Personally i would never hit a child - that said - I've seen problem children on shows like the super nanny
and the problem is never the kids - its always the parents who don't understand the idea of disciple without hurt and wanna be nice to their kids and children see that as weakness and take advantage of this.
There no reason to ever hit a child - its always with the weak parenting skill of the parent and a firm hand is no substitute for a firm mind.
on a side note : In western society - most parents have had 13 years of learning crap that is 97% useless information - Isnt it weird that the skills they really need the most - are the skills they never spent any time learning?
Baloney. People are indoctrinated into this epicurean cult of reasoning and think that pain is the devil and ultimate evil and theres nothing worse than personal suffering
The reality is that pain exists because it serves a greater good, as a stimulus to stop us from taking harmful actions, a deterrent and conditioning.
For a parent to utilize nature's chief method of discipline for that very purpose, its only natural, its only right.
Pain is immaterial and has a role in human development. While there are other useful methods to bring up a child, and by no means should there be only stick and no carrot, using
only crude methods, its a competent tool when used justly and conservatively.
A few moments of pain is nothing compared to keeping a child away from a debauched and degenerate life. Whooping a kid until he straightens out his act is doing him a service, and to refuse to discipline your child out of misguided doting is to do them a disservice in the long run.
Spare the rod, spoil the child. Not every child needs the rod, but lord save us when the femonazis take it away and tell kids they are all special snowflakes and everyone is a winner. Fatty lumpkins will never have impetus to get better