I was reading that the Democratic National Committee plans to take on Mitt Romney's attacks on the President concerning this statement. Additionally, the groups is going to go after Mitt Romney's business record.
As a strategy, I'm not sure if that is the wisest move. They probably have poll tested the idea, so maybe there is something to the idea, but overall I'd do what I can to move on and hope the public forgets the President's mention of, "you didn't build that."
"Is Assault on Romney’s Small Business Record a Wise Move?"
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/07/25/is-assault-on-romney-small-business-record-wise-move/except from Alana Goodman's article:
Quote
...Then there’s Obama’s health care law, which is expected to increase health care costs and the regulatory burden for small businesses. The cost of complying with government regulations is a growing problem under the Obama administration, as the Fiscal Times has reported:
The Business Roundtable just released a list of 60 major new pending rules and regulations from the federal government – all of which may dampen economic activity. The NFIB is so worried about the uncertainty created by Obama’s legislative tsunami that it is supporting the Regulatory Freeze for Jobs Act, a bill that would prohibit important new regulations from taking effect before the unemployment rate drops to 6 percent or for two years, whichever is shorter. Embracing such a “time-out” would be an excellent move for the embattled White House, and most definitely for the country.
The Obama campaign is obviously anxious to get back on offense, but picking this particular fight is only going to end up emphasizing Obama’s own weaknesses.