d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Israel Condemns Dog To Stoning > It's A Secular Lawyer Reincarnated
Prev12345Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 756
Joined: Apr 27 2011
Gold: 263.00
Jun 18 2011 01:56pm
Quote (bitg_pj @ Jun 18 2011 10:42am)


Not to mention, Israel has killed Millions of innocents, and harmed hundreds of millions with their actions....let's not forget that...



Hundreds of millions? fucking bad troll

Also about the story I didnt read it but I do know that the middle eastern mentality to animals such as dogs is a lot different than the mindset we have here in America. Animals are treated are over there just as what they are: animals. You wont see a dog dressed up in a t-shirt with a bow in its hair in the middle east or sitting in a ladies gucci bag like you would here in america.
Member
Posts: 4,248
Joined: Oct 5 2010
Gold: 1,995.00
Jun 18 2011 02:00pm
Quote (WidowMaKer_MK @ Jun 18 2011 03:19pm)
Seems it's more like how you and the other bashers like to use Westboro Baptist as an example of true Christianity  :o


It's funny how you like to compare Al-Qaeda and other extremist terrorist groups and label all Islam that way.

Quit being hypocritical.
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Jun 18 2011 03:07pm
Quote (shay11 @ Jun 18 2011 06:58pm)
You are still over-extending yourself by accepting the absurd assumption in this method of slander.

1) All societies/cultures/religions have certain practices that can be pointed out as morally and logically bankrupt.

2) Saying one "bad" practice sums up a religions is no more valid than saying one "good" practice sums them up entirely.

3) Stoning animals to death, of which humans are animals lest we forget, is a fairly difficult thing to defend on a moral level, just admit it is inappropriate, whether it is humans, dogs, or rabbits. All you are arguing in this post is "yeah it's bad but this is other practice is worse so forget the fact they are doing something wrong." In so doing, all you have done is lent legitimacy to the absurdity I pointed out above.


There is nothing wrong with killing a dog that has harmed someone else. It's pretty common to do that actually.
Member
Posts: 20,885
Joined: Aug 23 2003
Gold: 13,405.43
Jun 18 2011 05:34pm
Quote (thundercock @ Jun 18 2011 05:07pm)
There is nothing wrong with killing a dog that has harmed someone else.  It's pretty common to do that actually.


Nice dodge, the distinction is clearly the manner in which the animal is killed.
Member
Posts: 3,333
Joined: Mar 15 2007
Gold: 0.00
Jun 18 2011 05:37pm
Quote (thundercock @ 18 Jun 2011 14:07)
There is nothing wrong with killing a dog that has harmed someone else.  It's pretty common to do that actually.


LOL yea its the dog's problem for it to exist
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Jun 18 2011 08:58pm
Quote (shay11 @ Jun 18 2011 11:34pm)
Nice dodge, the distinction is clearly the manner in which the animal is killed.


I don't see anything wrong with stoning a rabid dog to death.
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Jun 18 2011 09:23pm
Quote (shay11 @ Jun 18 2011 11:34pm)
Nice dodge, the distinction is clearly the manner in which the animal is killed.


I don't see a problem with stoning. In Israel, they are pretty humane about it. Generally, they use a crane and drop a large slab of concrete on the creature. That way, it's as painless as possible (crushed to death immediately) and it is in accordance with rabbinic law.
Member
Posts: 20,885
Joined: Aug 23 2003
Gold: 13,405.43
Jun 18 2011 10:44pm
Quote (bogie160 @ Jun 18 2011 10:58pm)
I don't see anything wrong with stoning a rabid dog to death.


You wouldn't, but your moral compass has been demagnetized for several years now.

Quote (thundercock @ Jun 18 2011 11:23pm)
I don't see a problem with stoning.  In Israel, they are pretty humane about it.  Generally, they use a crane and drop a large slab of concrete on the creature.  That way, it's as painless as possible (crushed to death immediately) and it is in accordance with rabbinic law.


Great use of resources, but the thing down and be done with it, no need to maximize the suffering of a living creature, and certainly no need to have it be done at the hands of children.
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Jun 18 2011 11:24pm
Quote (shay11 @ Jun 19 2011 04:44am)
You wouldn't, but your moral compass has been demagnetized for several years now.



Great use of resources, but the thing down and be done with it, no need to maximize the suffering of a living creature, and certainly no need to have it be done at the hands of children.


It's not maximizing the suffering of a vile beast. It's not like we're burning it alive or tearing it apart limb by limb. As I said before, it's relatively humane compared to most other methods of execution.
Member
Posts: 20,885
Joined: Aug 23 2003
Gold: 13,405.43
Jun 19 2011 08:07am
Quote (thundercock @ Jun 19 2011 01:24am)
It's not maximizing the suffering of a vile beast.  It's not like we're burning it alive or tearing it apart limb by limb.  As I said before, it's relatively humane compared to most other methods of execution.


Would you rather be stoned to death or given a shot that put you to sleep?
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev12345Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll