I will agree that the analogy is not the best, but it is fairly decent. Which pool he swam in IS relevant. If he swam in an Olympic sized pool vs. a much smaller backyard pool, each lap will be considerably different in size.

Ignore all the other parts though, and feel free to believe what you want.

In order to be considered ancient it must date back beyond 3000BC where there were no written evidence, mostly 'object' evidence in which case art is grouped into to.
For example, they could have been painted on a wall (like the aboriginals did in Australia with kangaroos etc), or incorporated into pottery.



what parts? there were other parts?


This post was edited by Vengance on May 23 2011 08:53am

Indeed, but it was not always practiced.

The link I provided has art from said time period, as well as newer material. Please check it out, and fact check their sources.

I listed half a dozen facts about dating techniques and how they are used. Since you ignored them, I will conclude that you agree they are facts that represent how dating techniques work and function. You additionally ignored the size of the pool. You are the troll here, which is clear.

? I agree with your informative speech on how dating techniques work; I learned about that in my ancient history class. I'm not debating here seriously, you shouldn't even be aiming at me lol.

There was Noah's Ark, the bible specifically states that not every creature made it to the ark.

The world was an evil place with many evil things.

Would you want a TREX chasing you?



Carbon dating, ikr

This post was edited by Powerful on May 23 2011 09:01am

I wish I lived back then. I'd have a pet t-rex.. until he got too big of course. Then I would have to set him free into the wild.

Why is a T-Rex evil, simply because it was a predator? We're predators, brah.

So by the looks of it, you can see in most of the pictures the "dinosaurs" to human size ratio. What is depicted in the artwork there are creatures (descendants of dinosaurs from what i can see due to size) that are roughly half the height of humans, which kind of proves the evolutionary theory. The dinosaurs that have been found by archeologists, are many times the size of a human. Also, it noted that no human bones had ever been found near dinosaur bones. It said if this did happen, it could disprove evolution, which again would be false, unless they found a (t-rex) in full size, on the same level of sediment, had proof that level of sediment has been untouched, as the dinosaurs. It is interesting, but everything depicted was not of that size that we see in our museums.

Please do some basic study on art, specifically ancient artwork. It was rarely "to scale". Also, for many reasons man would draw something to be the same size as man, such as an ego thing. You make the creature smaller to make yourself seem "bigger". Many of the text descriptions have descriptions that do not fit small dinosaurs. For instance, the Behemoth having a tail like a "cedar tree" (Job 40:17, from the bible).



Here is one example. Does that mean these birds were the size of man (or bigger?). No, of course not. They didn't draw to scale during this time.