d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Free Speech Activists
Prev12345Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 21,958
Joined: Jun 14 2012
Gold: 331,454.58
Sep 14 2025 12:32pm
Lmao you had the MSNBC person get fried but then on the other hand you have a fox news idiot saying homeless, mentally ill and disabled people not engaging in programs should just be given an involuntary lethal injection, just kill em.

They're all clowns.


It's all propaganda. They divide and control. :mellow:
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Sep 14 2025 12:38pm
It's a matter of degrees. In the aftermath of George Floyd's death you saw people targeted for calling out violence and looting for what it was, or refusing to adopt the ever evolving dialect of the far left.
Celebrating the murder of a 31-year old father of two is pretty far gone, and it's fair to say that they wouldn't have been hired had they led with that on their resume. The Office Depot case had employees refuse to print a poster of Kirk, which makes it clearly the company's problem, the employees are making a business decision to refuse service which the company hadn't empowered them to make.
Member
Posts: 21,958
Joined: Jun 14 2012
Gold: 331,454.58
Sep 14 2025 12:53pm
It's a matter of degrees.


32 here, would be 33 but i'm not willing to murder a christian, despite spitting on the cross.
Member
Posts: 8,171
Joined: Nov 13 2021
Gold: 695.67
Sep 14 2025 01:09pm
every company that I've worked for has made me sign a contract.

In that contract it outlines that I won't do or say anything to misrepresent the company, and other legalese language.
This includes on the job, in public and in private.

If any of you actually read your employment contract you'd know this is true...
Or you're a jobless welfare bum who's never had to sign a contract for employment.

Zero sympathy for people who signed a contract, then directly went against it.


If you’re posting shit on LinkedIn where people can easily associate you with your company that’s one thing. On your own time unassociated with the company it’s a lot more gray.

Can companies do this? Many can (depends on the state laws, your contract, whether you’re on your probationary period, etc). Should they? More questionable.
Member
Posts: 21,958
Joined: Jun 14 2012
Gold: 331,454.58
Sep 14 2025 01:17pm
If you’re posting shit on LinkedIn where people can easily associate you with your company that’s one thing. On your own time unassociated with the company it’s a lot more gray.


ITS IN THE CONTRACT YOU SIGN WHEN YOU BECOME AN EMPLOYEE
Member
Posts: 21,958
Joined: Jun 14 2012
Gold: 331,454.58
Sep 14 2025 01:27pm
I keep tripling down on this topic because...

people don't read contracts.
people don't read terms of service.
people don't read rules.

Can really attack these people but I'll digress, it's frustrating to hear them crying when they legally accepted the responsibility.
Member
Posts: 12,289
Joined: Jul 22 2007
Gold: 84.67
Warn: 10%
Sep 14 2025 01:46pm
do you pay your bills with their money outside of work?

Edit: nobody put a gun to your head and forced you to sign the contract.


Yikes. Instead of deleting incorrect notions ill make it so people can still read them.

Economy 101. Take it.
Member
Posts: 21,958
Joined: Jun 14 2012
Gold: 331,454.58
Sep 14 2025 01:47pm
Yikes. Instead of deleting incorrect notions ill make it so people can still read them.

Economy 101. Take it.


Imagine sharing that I made a mistake and instead of trying to hide it, I say hey. I made a mistake, i'm sorry here is what I meant.

Very tired of this Lack Of Responsibility

This post was edited by Mondain on Sep 14 2025 01:48pm
Member
Posts: 50,668
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,866.00
Sep 14 2025 02:08pm
Before state intervention or witchhunting should tread upon people's speech, maybe we need to ask what is changing that so much militancy got tolerated. And there's an element to how parties are being run

Perhaps a centralized party around a cult of personality has the advantage that the leader can sway his people away from violence. Its been taken axiomatically that dictators lead their people to violence, because we saw so much of it in the 20th century and engrained it into the public consciousness. That's also perhaps a super long term recency bias, we've had thousands of years of rules, some violent, some benevolent. With an authoritarian leader, all your eggs are in that one basket.
Right now we're seeing a proliferation of militancy and violence from the US (and global) left-wing. Yet no charismatic rulers are emerging, the closest thing to someone getting wider support is a fossilized bernie sanders. There is no Kingfish, no MLK, no Lenin or Marx. Its a rudderless movement, and yet its descending into worse and worse violence. Now contrast MAGA america. We saw bubbling strands of militancy and extremism and some sporadic violence from the far-right, we had the Unite the Right rally, magabomber. But beyond individual actors, it was a whole undercurrent of the Qanon nutcases who threatened to boil over into violence. But who tamped them down, who suppressed them? It was Donald Trump, the same guy who riled them up in the first place. Trump is the one who told people to go home and be peaceful, he's the one saying his movement is exclusionary to extremists. He's the one who decisively cut ties with neo-nazis and white nationalists. He drew his hard lines and forced the party to accept them.

Democrats don't have any of that right now. The far-left is a white hot shrieking ball of rage with nobody to keep it under any kind of control. They hate the democratic leadership, they hate each other. There's nobody shaping the progressive movement and gatekeeping to remove antifa, communists, islamists, eco-terrorists, anti-natalists, etc. The few democrats who engage with them willingly share a stage with militant radicals. If Bernie Sanders said the left should kick antifa out of the party, they'd call him an old white man, label him a colonizer and post his home address for assassins.
Member
Posts: 78,723
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 493.00
Sep 14 2025 02:42pm
I thought you were in favor of this kind of behavior/accountability? What has changed?


I've never been in favour of organized campaigns to crawl through people's social media feeds to destroy their livlihoods. Think of what would happen if jspers got doxxed?

shoop loses his job for misogny
dmitry loses his job for white supremacy
sirthom gets taken in by the fbi for well... you know..
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev12345Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll