Quote (MildSambal @ Sep 19 2024 01:07pm)
If a person born colorblind is told that the table in front of them is brown, what convincing evidence is there for them? He can’t “know” that it is brown because it’s beyond his capacity. He can still come to the conclusion that the table in front of him is brown based on deductive reasoning
The same thing is true for faith based reasoning
validity rests on verification from inner sight, evil capitalizes by corrupting that vision. Hence christ's inside of the cup parable. language is the transcription of a feeling backed perception(s), and the quality or truth thereby.language for a liar is a mimic of that perception & or blindness, and the deceit thereby.
jesus called it the thorn in the "minds eye" because if you can see the sun or live by pleasurable morality then why would you want to be vicariously numb or devoid? why exist only to transcribe perceptions w/ words, aka speaking? why speak in the presence of god, or even yourself?
unless to help others see again & with these restorative articulations; the sun is overly powerful to protect from a powerfully cold darkness that damages perception & truth.
in essence universal communication, feeling & understanding requires no wiggling of a tongue and very little writing, but since the world is spiritually blind & or damaged, they use a
social braille that is speaking & read/writing to engage one another especially in lieu of having no perception or feeling..
by this you might understand modern religions are the emotional con artistry of blind faith upheld by science that has become a lighted seduction of betrayed assumptions. the prerequisite(s) of true faith is also the hallmark of science, aka calibration of the human senses.
So if all roads lead back to same quick sand,
then you know the light of the world's truths have truly"perished"