d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Transgender Question For Conservatives
Prev1234514Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 92,928
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Aug 21 2024 07:00am
being trans isn't a mental illness, but being trans all but guarantees you have a mental illness. depression, bipolar, ptsd, etc. its sort of a "no one dies from HIV" situation.

now let's look at the liberal interpretation of this clear reality, which goes something like: "being trans doesnt cause depression, its the treatment of trans people that causes the depression and suicidal ideation".

i contend that if we provide all the HRT and medical care we can, and make the society they enter perfectly accepting, we'll still see high rates of suicide, depression, and bipolar. you cant have a brain that doesnt match your body and not have mental illness in most cases, its a condition most people simply cant deal with.
Member
Posts: 9,116
Joined: May 11 2009
Gold: 5.01
Aug 21 2024 07:40am
Quote (Handcuffs @ Aug 21 2024 03:08am)
My quandary comes from a personal belief that if I were to view a person, or a demographic of people, as "mentally ill" then I would have certain principles and expectations for myself with respect to how I speak about them and with other people. Making compilation videos, reaction videos, and eviscerating people in comment sections would not align with my personal views on this. I wouldn't accept this with any other form of mental illness, such as people with schizophrenia, and I imagine most people wouldn't either. What I assume then, is that transgender people are an exception in the category of "mental illness", and so the usage probably conveys some alternative meaning than standard usage of the term.




I don't think Americans at large really care enough about LGBTQ+ issues to go at length to berate or eviscerate those pushing/advocating in that space. Like with the Olympics trans controversy another made a comment on. Most US people thought, "well that's weird, gonna grab a beer" Obviously the internet content creators going to exploit the few fringe quacks for views, but that is a skewed perspective. We are at a point where even the most conservative families reconcile with gender identity among their own kin. I do think it's treated more compassionately then what you are portraying from media troll click baits.

Member
Posts: 50,737
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,146.00
Aug 21 2024 08:19am
You have to get past the argument by definition, by semantics, by word association

When it comes to labels and terms, like 'Mental illness', or 'what is a woman', or so on- language is just a tool we use to reflect our observation of the natural world. It serves only to describe phenomenon, it does not change their nature. It simply does not matter whether you describe trangenderism as a mental illness or not, the underlying circumstances are still the same. Should we only consider someone mentally ill if the clinical diagnosis is consistent with the latest definitions in the DSM-5? Even if the APA has been overtly puppeteered by social activists who rewrote its definitions? Same with dictionaries, of course, bent to those who think changing language can change reality.

If someone is born with XY chromosomes, they are male. If they are born with XX chromosomes, they are female. 99.99% of people adhere 99.99% to phenotypical genders as far as biology is concerned. As far as quality of life, identifying as transgender has all the statistical negative outcomes, morbidity, associated violence or self-harm of all other mental illnesses uncontroversially described as such. Maybe paranoid schizophrenics have worse outcomes, idk, but its clear enough that transgender self-identification among adults (not including children having it forced upon them) has been rare and the rare cases having wildly overrepresented levels of suicide, depression, aggression, pedophilia, etc.
Member
Posts: 9,811
Joined: Jan 2 2011
Gold: 217.69
Aug 21 2024 08:39am
I’d like to add that surgery for a trans is very detrimental to one’s health. It will come with a lot of complications and might even lose sensation, not to mention staying on the path of transition means you have close to zero % chance of having offspring. The whole point of humans, animals or other beings on this earth has to serve the main purpose, and that is to procreate. Trans cannot effectively procreate on large number of scales.

It also makes no sense whatsoever to try to push trans agenda to young kids in school, they are barely old enough to know and a lot of other stuff they have no say without their parents.

This post was edited by Tarisus on Aug 21 2024 08:46am
Member
Posts: 105,127
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Aug 21 2024 08:43am
Quote (Handcuffs @ Aug 21 2024 02:11am)
I'm not sure. Retrofitting is certainly one idea, but I'm wondering if you have thoughts on the question in the OP?




That kind of was my thoughts about the OP.
The subject will show up in this topic, sooner or later. I just jumped ahead, a little bit. :)
Member
Posts: 28,866
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Aug 21 2024 09:02am
Quote (Goomshill @ Aug 21 2024 10:19am)
You have to get past the argument by definition, by semantics, by word association

When it comes to labels and terms, like 'Mental illness', or 'what is a woman', or so on- language is just a tool we use to reflect our observation of the natural world. It serves only to describe phenomenon, it does not change their nature. It simply does not matter whether you describe trangenderism as a mental illness or not, the underlying circumstances are still the same. Should we only consider someone mentally ill if the clinical diagnosis is consistent with the latest definitions in the DSM-5? Even if the APA has been overtly puppeteered by social activists who rewrote its definitions? Same with dictionaries, of course, bent to those who think changing language can change reality.

If someone is born with XY chromosomes, they are male. If they are born with XX chromosomes, they are female. 99.99% of people adhere 99.99% to phenotypical genders as far as biology is concerned. As far as quality of life, identifying as transgender has all the statistical negative outcomes, morbidity, associated violence or self-harm of all other mental illnesses uncontroversially described as such. Maybe paranoid schizophrenics have worse outcomes, idk, but its clear enough that transgender self-identification among adults (not including children having it forced upon them) has been rare and the rare cases having wildly overrepresented levels of suicide, depression, aggression, pedophilia, etc.


/thread

This argument has been had a million times at this point, it's honestly settled but there's a level of cognitive dissonance that's unpierceable

Member
Posts: 21,407
Joined: Jun 15 2007
Gold: 120,303.00
Aug 21 2024 09:37am
Attaching a neophallus to the head is not an established medical procedure, and pursuing such an unconventional surgery would come with significant risks and few, if any, benefits. Here are the potential risks and a hypothetical consideration of benefits:

### Risks

1. **Infection**: Any major surgery carries a risk of infection, which could be severe given the complexity and unconventional nature of the procedure.

2. **Necrosis**: The tissue might not receive adequate blood supply, leading to tissue death (necrosis).

3. **Poor Wound Healing**: The head and face are highly vascular areas, and improper healing could lead to significant complications and scarring.

4. **Nerve Damage**: There's a high risk of damaging nerves in the head, potentially leading to loss of sensation or motor function.

5. **Psychological Impact**: Undergoing such an extreme and unconventional surgery could lead to severe psychological distress and body image issues.

6. **Anesthesia Complications**: As with any surgery, there are risks associated with general anesthesia, including allergic reactions and respiratory issues.

7. **Functional Problems**: The neophallus would not have any functional benefits when attached to the head, potentially leading to complications without providing any practical use.

8. **Social and Interpersonal Challenges**: Such a modification could result in significant social stigma and difficulties in personal and professional interactions.

### Hypothetical Benefits

It's challenging to list benefits for a procedure that lacks medical justification and is not supported by medical practice. However, hypothetically:

1. **Personal Satisfaction**: If the modification aligns with an individual's unique aesthetic or personal identity goals, there might be a perceived benefit in terms of personal satisfaction.

2. **Expression of Identity**: For those deeply interested in body modification and self-expression, such a procedure could be seen as an extreme form of personal expression.

### Conclusion

The risks of attempting to attach a neophallus to the head far outweigh any potential benefits. Medical professionals adhere to ethical standards and established practices to ensure patient safety and well-being, making it highly unlikely that any reputable surgeon would perform such a procedure.

If you're interested in body modification, consider consulting with professionals who specialize in safe and ethical practices. They can help you explore alternative ways to achieve your aesthetic or identity goals without jeopardizing your health and well-being.
Member
Posts: 9,004
Joined: Mar 15 2008
Gold: 2,150.00
Aug 21 2024 09:51am
Quote (Handcuffs @ Aug 21 2024 01:56am)
I have a legitimate question for resident conservatives about the discourse around transgender people within your spaces. I do try and see what conservatives have to say on this, but I'm left confused and hoping that folks can elucidate:

It appears that the prevailing opinion among conservatives is that transgender people / "transgenderism" is a mental illness. I'm not going to question that position, and want to accept that that is how it is viewed (but am happy to also hear that my understanding is incorrect). Given that the prevailing opinion is that this is a form of mental illness, I wonder what are the standards, principles, or expectations amongst conservatives for when you speak about, or with each other about, people with mental illness?

As an outsider, it seems commonplace that people make transgender compilation videos, TikTok reaction videos (I've seen Ben Shapiro and Candace Owens do this in particular), and share other forms of content where then conservatives absolutely eviscerate the people featured in terms of their physical appearance, attire, speech, mannerisms, etc. This I find difficult to understand or reconcile. I've not seen or heard a conservative thought leader speak out and say that if this is the prevailing conservative opinion, then we should be intentional about how we speak about people with mental illness. I believe conservatives would not find this same behavior acceptable if it were done about people with other forms of mental illness, or at least that is my hope. For some reason though, transgender people are seemingly an exception.

I welcome thoughts and reactions. Thanks!


What is your approach to straight people? Just wondering....

I don't think transgender is a mental illness. I'm not a repub, but I am conservative minded. I think it's a fundamental choice that the religious right turned into a demonizing taboo for people so that they could attempt to destroy it. I think that was a bad play. That, I believe, is why they attempted to attach mental illness to Trans. I'm Bi, personally, Bipolar, that is. ;) and trust me, no one wants to be called mental... Caitlin does not seem to be mentally handicapped. He just wants to do his thing!!! sorry if wrong pronouns, I think he goes by he still? I have no idea... my bad if pissy people see this!

Let the people bang who they want and live their life their way, that's what I say. Honestly, sometimes, you will see a dude dressed WAY BETTER as a lady than any of the cis ladies in the room! :)

So, we became ashamed of our choices... Trans folk should not be shamed because they like sex different than you. And it certainly doesn't make them mentally challenged. Dude, we are all the same in the middle... My blood is the same color with or without eye shadow and a dress. This is why this topic is SOOOOO boring at this point. Let them eat cake!

But at the end of the day, Trans folk need to realize that they can live their lives and live them to the fullest, but as soon as they pull the "trans card", then they will be harassed and looked down upon. And for some reason, Trans folk continue to poke the bear...

So again, how does a typical transgender person (I have no idea about you personally, just asking in general) look at us straight folk? :) Can you say that if a straight person demanded all this stuff that it would be ok in society? Or do you use the argument that since we have male/female that straight people demanded that too? Nah, not really, it's just the way it always was....

This post was edited by MaysLanding on Aug 21 2024 09:54am
Member
Posts: 843
Joined: Sep 15 2023
Gold: 3,700.85
Aug 21 2024 10:56am
Why do we care so much bout people sexuality? Like i don't give a fuck what you get roamed by. Nobody cares. Ima still laugh when i see you larp being a female with a wig and a women dress while being a man but at the end of the day, you do you. No need for pride month, no need to bother people with your sexuality and focus on the real issues we're facing which is mass immigration, corporations taking over the world and people having two brain cells living for entertainment only which is also owned by corporations which turn people into npcs parroting the same garbage.

Like why is it so important that the world know these people like to dress like the opposite gender and larp being the opposite gender. Why should we change everything because these people love roleplaying. Do you see the world create straight month, straight events and shit like that? No because straight people don't remind people there straight all year round like gay people don't . We just date, enjoy life and keep on being exploited by corporations and the elite.

This post was edited by iLoveMyUsername on Aug 21 2024 10:58am
Member
Posts: 45,717
Joined: Aug 25 2008
Gold: 40,130.00
Aug 21 2024 10:59am
Quote (Handcuffs @ 21 Aug 2024 13:56)
I have a legitimate question for resident conservatives about the discourse around transgender people within your spaces. I do try and see what conservatives have to say on this, but I'm left confused and hoping that folks can elucidate:

It appears that the prevailing opinion among conservatives is that transgender people / "transgenderism" is a mental illness. I'm not going to question that position, and want to accept that that is how it is viewed (but am happy to also hear that my understanding is incorrect). Given that the prevailing opinion is that this is a form of mental illness, I wonder what are the standards, principles, or expectations amongst conservatives for when you speak about, or with each other about, people with mental illness?

As an outsider, it seems commonplace that people make transgender compilation videos, TikTok reaction videos (I've seen Ben Shapiro and Candace Owens do this in particular), and share other forms of content where then conservatives absolutely eviscerate the people featured in terms of their physical appearance, attire, speech, mannerisms, etc. This I find difficult to understand or reconcile. I've not seen or heard a conservative thought leader speak out and say that if this is the prevailing conservative opinion, then we should be intentional about how we speak about people with mental illness. I believe conservatives would not find this same behavior acceptable if it were done about people with other forms of mental illness, or at least that is my hope. For some reason though, transgender people are seemingly an exception.

I welcome thoughts and reactions. Thanks!


As an Asia.....East / South East. Transgender was never a problem for us. You guys in the US made it a problem. We have been living with them for as long as I know since I was born. They do their stuff we do our stuff. They don't fiddle with kids and some of them actually found love.

Those transgenders that we know in East / South East Asia really wanted to be girls. The ones in US...oh well....

Yes I am a conservative, most of us are culturally conservatives.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1234514Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll