Quote (Prox1m1ty @ Aug 1 2024 04:59am)
Come on, you can't say guy is not an aggressor as he is swinging a machete around for a minute at a train station.
That is pretty aggressive, is it not? :D
Maybe I missed the part but first guy drew a knife? I read he claimed to have a knife. Either way, fuck both those guys ^^
Yeah the other guy drew his knife and made a threat to kill him, first, before the guy who got convicted responded by drawing a machete
The aggressor is the person who starts the conflict, who first escalates it to violence / lethal harm. You can define it a bunch of ways, like the person who attacks first, without reasonable cause, who escalates the situation to violence or fear of bodily harm, etc etc, but the whole point of the word is it makes the distinction that two parties can be fighting when only one of them initiated the fight. The implicit understanding is that when attacked unprovoked, one has a right to defend themselves, and defending yourself from violence, with violence, isn't an act of aggression. Of course you can muddle that message with what it means to initiate the conflict, and whether you create the circumstances or bait someone into attacking you or so on. That argument can be make for ukraine vs russia with russia's direct invasion vs the maidan overthrow of the government, or in minnesota law with several high profile cases dealing with self defense recently.
Quote (Santara @ Aug 1 2024 04:27am)
How do they square their ruling with our right to openly carry?
this is just consistent with their interpretation of the right to bear arms, which is that you have the right to possess a non-functional firearm only inside your own home, only if its of a small caliber bolt/hammer action, only if kept locked up in a separate room from the ammunition, and you're not allowed to place the ammo into the gun under any circumstances or you commit a felony. And a rubber band is a machine gun.